Nanoscopic Ni Interfaced with Oxygen Conductive Supports: Link between Electrochemical and Catalytic Studies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Electrochemical promotion of catalysis (EPOC) or non-faradaic modification of catalytic activity (NEMCA) is a general phenomenon observed at the interface of solid-state electrochemistry and heterogeneous catalysis [1,2]. When the metal or metal oxide catalyst is interfaced with ionically conductive ceramic (solid electrolyte), the application of small electrical stimulus (current or potential) between the catalyst and a counter electrode results in occurrence of two parallel processes: (i) electrochemical reactions at the three phase boundary (tpb) and (ii) spillover/backspillover of ionic species to/from the solid electrolyte to the gas exposed catalyst surface. These ionic species act as promoters for the catalytic reaction and the promoted rate increase is several orders of magnitude higher than one predicted by Faraday’s law. The two most common promoters are Na+ cation from β″-Al2O3 and O2-anion provided from yttiria-stabilized-zirconia (YSZ) electrolyte. The existance of these ionic promoters was confirmed by a variety of surface science and electrochemical techniques [1]. The application of EPOC to nanoscopic, highly dispersed catalysts is of significant interest and represents one of the main challenges for practical application of this phenomenon [2, 3]. The goal of the present work is to investigate EPOC with Pt and Ru nanoparticles (2.5 nm average size) interfaced with YSZ (8% Y2O3-ZrO2) solid electrolyte for ethylene combustion reaction at T= 220 – 375 oC. To this end, the nanoparticles of Pt and Ru were synthesized using polyol method [4] and deposited on YSZ disk. Nanoparticles were subject to detailed electrochemical characterization to find the exchange current (Io) of electrochemical process at tpb and to link it to the apparent faradaic efficiency, |Λ| (eq. 1) and (2) defined in EPOC studies as [1]: |Λ| = Δr/(I/nF) (1) or |Λ| ≈ 2Fro/Io (2) where Δr (mol O/s) is the increase in the catalytic rate divided by the electrochemical rate, ro is the open circuit reaction rate, I/nF (n = 2 for O2-). The process is considered non-Faradaic if |Ʌ|is greater than 1. Figure 1 shows the transient reaction rate response of ethylene combustion over Pt nanoparticles under open circuit (U = 0 V) and under positive potentiostatic polarization (U = 0.5V) at 350 °C. Under closed circuit, the significant and reversible increase in the reaction rate is observed with the rate enhancement ratio r (ratio of the rate under closed circuit over the rate value at the open circuit) reaching 1.79 (i.e. 79 % increase) and the corresponding Faradaic efficiency, Ʌ, value of 23. This indicates that each O2-ion supplied to the Pt catalyst causes on average the catalytic reaction of 23 adsorbed O species originating from the gas phase. The effect of the applied constant potential and current, as well as partial pressure of ethylene, reaction temperature on EPOC effect for both Pt and Ru nanoparticles will be presented. The role of electrified nanoscopic interfaces on the extent of the rate increase will be discussed and rationalized using the exchange current density values [5]. References: 1. C. G. Vayenas, S. Bebelis, C. Pliangos, S. Brosda, D. Tsiplakides, Electrochemical Activation of Catalysis: Promotion, Electrochemical Promotion, and Metal-Support Interactions. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2001. 2. P Vernoux, L. Lizzaraga, A. De Lucas-Consuegra, J.-L. Valverde, S. Souentie, C. Vayenas, D. Tsiplakides, S. Balomenou, E.A. Baranova, Chem. Reviews. 113, 10, (2013) 8192 – 8260. 3. H.A.E. Dole, E.A. Baranova Implementation of Nano-structured Catalysts in the Electrochemical Promotion of Catalysis, in Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry: Electrochemical Synthesis Methods, Properties, and Characterization Techniques. Aliofkhazraei, M., Makhlouf, A.S.H. (Eds.), Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2015) 1095-1124. 4. E. A., Baranova, C. Bock, D. Ilin, D.Wang, B. MacDougall, Surf. Sci.600 (2006) 3502–3511. 5. H. A. E. Dole, L. F. Safady, S. Ntais, M. Couillard, E.A. Baranova, J. Catal.318 (2014) 85–94. Figure 1
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».