MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4238119063 · doi:10.1149/ma2015-03/2/594

Fluorinated Electrolyte for High Voltage Li(Ni<sub>0.4</sub>Mn<sub>0.4</sub>Co<sub>0.2</sub>)O<sub>2</sub> (NMC442)/Graphite Pouch Cells

2015· article· en· W4238119063 sur OpenAlexaff
J. R. Dahn, Jian Xia, John C. Burns, Ang Xiao, Bill Lamanna

Notice bibliographique

RevueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueAdvancements in Battery Materials
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésElectrolyteGraphiteMaterials scienceCathodeHigh voltageChemical engineeringCarbonateElectrochemistryElectrodeVoltageChemistryMetallurgyElectrical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction One of the best ways to increase the energy density of Li-ion batteries is to utilize high voltage cathode materials. Li(Ni0.4Mn0.4Co0.2)O2 (NMC442) has been proposed as a promising cathode material for high voltage Li-ion batteries. However, the instability of conventional organic carbonates towards high voltage is a great challenge [1, 2]. Searching for an appropriate electrolyte system is essential for application of these materials at high potential. In this presentation, fluorinated carbonate mixtures which are composed of fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) and bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) carbonate (TFEC) are shown to be viable in NMC442/graphite pouch cells that can be cycled to at least 4.5 V. The introduction of proper electrolyte additives has been shown to improve the cell performance. Long-term cycling results were also made to compare with 1 M LiPF6 EC/EMC (3:7 wt.%) with and without additives. Experimental The pouch cells employed in this study were Li[Ni0.4 Mn0.4Co0.2]O2 (NMC442)/graphite cells with a capacity of 240 mAh and coated NMC442/graphite cells with a capacity of 180 mAh. The positive electrode material in the coated cells has been coated with 3 wt% of LaPO4 which appears as nanoparticles on the NMC particle surfaces. Both types of cells were balanced for 4.7 V operation. 1 M LiPF6 EC/EMC (3:7 wt.% ratio, BASF, 99.99%) was used as the control electrolyte. The NMC442/graphite pouch cells were filled with 0.75 mL of electrolyte (0.90 g for EC:EMC=3:7 based electrolyte and 1.15 g for FEC:TFEC=1:1 based electrolyte). The cells then underwent a formation protocol during which they were opened and re-vacuum sealed at 3.5 V and again at 4.5 V to remove any gas generated during the first charge. In-situ gas measurements were made using the apparatus and procedure described in reference [3]. After formation, cells were then moved to the Ultra High Precision Charger (UHPC) for cycling. Storage tests were also used as were frequency response analyzer/cycling (FRA) experiments to measure the impedance growth during cycling [4]. The detailed testing method used in the FRA experiments is described in ref [3]. After these tests, cells were charged or discharged to 3.8 V where impedance spectra and gas volume produced were measured. Results and discussion Figure 1a shows the cell voltage versus time of two NMC442/graphite pouch cells with control and 2% VC in EC:EMC 3:7 electrolyte. Data for three other cells with, 2% PES, 2% PES + 1% MMDS and 2% PES + 1% TTSPi in FEC:TFEC 1:1 electrolyte are also shown. Figure 1b shows the in-situ gas volume versus time during the first two cycles for the same cells as shown in Figure 1a. Figures 1a and 1b show the FEC:TFEC electrolyte system containing PES as an electrolyte additive produces much less gas during the first a few cycles compared to the EC:EMC electrolyte system when charged to 4.5 V. However, a steady increase in gas volume produced occurs. Figure 1c shows the resistance, Rct, as a function of voltage for the NMC442/graphite pouch cells with 2% PES in FEC:TFEC 1:1 electrolyte at 40. ± 0.1ºC measured using the FRA.Figure 1c shows that Rct of the cells with FEC:TFEC:PES electrolyte does not increase when charged from 3.8 V to 4.5 V in each separate cycle. However, Rct increases as the cycle number increases. This suggests that FEC:TFEC electrolytes will not solve the problems associated with high voltage NMC/graphite cells. References L. Ma, J. Xia and J. R. Dahn, J. Electrochem. Soc., 161, A2250–A2254 (2014). L. Ma, J. Xia, and J. R. Dahn, Promising sulfur-containing electrolyte additives or ternary Electrolyte additive mixtures for Li-ion cells that promote long lifetime and better safety, 2015, submitted to J. Electrochem. Soc C. P.Aiken, J. Xia, D. Y. Wang, D. A. Stevens, S. Trussler and J. R. Dahn, J. Electrochem. Soc., 161, A1548–A1554 (2014). K. J. Nelson, G.L. d’Eon, A.T.B. Wright, L. Ma, J. Xia and J. R. Dahn, Studies of the effect of high voltage on the impedance and cycling performance of Li[Ni0.4Mn0.4Mn0.2]O2/graphite lithium-ion pouch cells, 2015, submitted to J. Electrochem. Soc. Figure caption Figure 1. (a) Cell voltage versus time during the first 260 h for the 240 mAh NMC/graphite pouch cells in FEC:TFEC 1:1 electrolyte with different additives cycled at C/20 (12 mA) and 40.0ºC; (b) Gas volume versus time measured using the Archimedes’ in-situ gas analyzer during the first ~260 h (2 continuous cycles and 2 cycles with 10 hour holds at 4.5 V). (c) Rct as a function of voltage measured every 5 cycles from 3.8 to 4.5 V on FRA. Rct increases with cycle number Figure 1

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,227
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueECS Meeting Abstracts→Même sujetAdvancements in Battery Materials→Travaux en français237 207→