Beneath the "Thin Veneer of Civilization": Evolution, Masculinity, and Race in the Early Twentieth Century United States
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
By the turn of the twentieth century, many Anglo-Saxon American men of a middle and upper class background began to define their identities by appealing to evolutionary thought.Homo erectus nordicus, they believed, was the greatest physical and mental specimen among the races of the world.Yet this narrative of evolutionary greatness through a history of Spencerian struggle in the natural world, defined by popular and scientific literature, seemed at odds with the condition of the modern American man.Their grand narrative of natural history stressed the need to engage with nature to embrace one's authentic identity as a man, in contrast to the effeminate and degenerative influences of civilization-which had been compromised, they believed, by the unnatural, growing cultural authority of women, immigrants, and organized labor.In this thesis, I argue that these evolutionary narratives of white masculinity portrayed the white male body as powerful yet vulnerable to degeneracy, setting an alarmist agenda for reclaiming a conservative cultural identity for the nation.Chapter 1 Introduction: The White Male Body and the New Biology in America "Know then thyself, presume not God to scan The proper study of Mankind is Man." -Alexander Pope, An Essay on Man (1734) The publication of Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species in 1859 may have precipitated one of the most profound revolutions in Western scientific thought, but his ideas were initially slow to take root in the United States.Louis Agassiz, the preeminent American biologist of his day, discounted not only Darwin's theory of natural selection but the concept of evolution entirely.Botanist Asa Gray, the most vocal American supporter of Darwin's views, was nevertheless uneasy about the Origin's seemingly materialist overtones.Gray was strongly committed, more so than most of Darwin's allies, to divine agency in evolution.1 In short, Darwin had no bulldog in the United States-at least not yet.After the death of Agassiz in 1873, evolution and the concept of natural selection would take root in American universities under a new generation of biologists.Yet, while few scientists were prepared to deny evolution outright, there was considerable disagreement as to the mechanisms that drove this change.2 Darwin's views came to be known as gradualism: the argument that members of a species (through methods that were admittedly not yet fully understood) would change slowly over time and environmental factors would drive some of those organisms to extinction while others would survive to reproduce.3 The evolutionary thought of Herbert Spencer placed special emphasis on competition between organisms, which 1 Mark A. Largent, "Darwinism in the United States, 1859-1930," in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and Evolutionary Thought (Cambridge:
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».