Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This book gives a fresh approach to the topic of categorical data analysis. The presentation of the statistical methods exploits the connection to regression modeling with a focus on practical features rather than formal theory. However, I am in doubt whether the regression approach of categorical data analysis is more intuitive than the approach that starts with contingency tables (see, e.g., Agresti, 1996). Surely, this may depend on the readers themselves. Epidemiologists thinking in fourfold tables may find the regression approach harder to understand than econometricians. The author discusses the various aspects of statistical modeling, i.e., model selection, checking the modeling assumptions, and points the reader to applied problems such as outliers and sparse cell counts in contingency tables. Finally, the reader is given an interpretation of analytical results along with real-world examples. And all this is done in a readable way, especially as the references are avoided in the main text body and discussed at the end of each chapter. The text is broken down into three main parts. The first part gives a prerequisite for the following by reviewing Gaussian-based data analysis and model building. The second part examines the modeling of count data. This includes count regression models such as Poisson regression and negative binomial models and log-linear models for contingency tables. Lastly, the third part of the book discusses logistic regression and alternative models for binary data, as well as extensions for multinomial and ordinal response variables. As emphasized by the title “Analyzing Categorical Data,” this is not a reference, but a textbook. The author makes use of many worked-out real data examples. The data and the computer code for analysis of the examples presented throughout the book are available to the reader via the Internet. The target audience is anyone faced with categorical data, ranging from undergraduate to Ph.D. students to professional data analysts in diverse fields including econometrics, sociology, and management, as well as biometrics and epidemiology. There is much to learn from this book. Aside from the ordinary materials such as association diagrams, Mantel–Haenszel estimators, or overdispersion, the reader will also find some less-often presented but interesting and stimulating topics. Among these is the “mosaic plot” for graphically representing association in contingency tables or “Benford's law” for anomalous numbers. However, from a personal point of view the book is missing here and there a few more pieces of information. For example, rules of thumb for the validity of asymptotic inference, e.g., when can we approximate the binomial by the normal distribution, and when do we need Fisher's exact test, and cannot use the Pearson χ2-statistic. Furthermore, the text does not address the analysis of dependent or clustered data. The presentation is restricted to fixed effects models, e.g., random coefficient and mixed models approaches such as GLMM (generalized linear mixed models) and GEE (generalized estimation equations) are not dealt with. For an introductory text, one might think that these topics can be excluded, but I wished that at least a discussion of these important aspects of analyzing categorical data would have been given in the form of an outlook chapter at the end. The interested reader may then consult a book with a broader scope such as Agresti (2002), or more specialized books such as Hosmer and Lemeshow (2000) or Diggle et al. (2002). Despite this, I think this is an excellent book, giving an up-to-date introduction to the wide field of analyzing categorical data.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,455 | 0,430 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».