Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Back in 2004, when The Journal of Experimental Biology was a mere 80 years old, we launched a new section revisiting classic papers from the journal that created paradigm shifts in understanding and established new fields. Over the past nine years, JEB Classics has highlighted the journal's expansive breadth: from James Gray's studies of the kinematics of eel locomotion to Bob Josephson's seminal paper on the muscle work loop, and many other topics in between, such as Donald Kennedy and Kimihisa Takeda's crayfish abdominal motor control and Dave Randall's suite of 1967 papers on in vivo blood-and-guts fish physiology. In turn, the section has gone on to become a staple of the journal's output in its own right, appearing six times each year until the final contribution, ‘A JEB classic on fish exercise’, by Tobias Wang and Hans Malte in December 2012.In addition to introducing younger scientists to the journal's impressive and diverse legacy, JEB Classics has allowed friends and colleagues of the journal to discuss much-valued treasures from the JEB archive. In addition to placing papers, some with more than half a century of influence, in a modern context, authors have also pointed out logistical and technical shortcomings – due to the antiquity of the research – that it is now possible to rectify, as well as highlighting yet-unanswered questions to inspire the next generation.Owing to the popularity of the section in print and online, we have also compiled two booklets of the earliest JEB Classics articles, covering the literature from 1923 to 1968. These booklets have proved a popular resource for students and young postdocs and we are planning a third booklet for 2013 to complete the collection.However, having made the editorial decision to define 1985 as the final year of publication when a JEB paper could truly be considered a ‘Classic’, we were faced with the dilemma of what should follow such a well-established and valued section. It was Hans Hoppeler, JEB Editor-in-Chief, who suggested that we broaden the remit to cover all of the integrative and comparative literature. So, this time, we asked the JEB community to recommend highly valued papers from the broader literature and, with over 40 recommendations from luminaries in the field, we have prepared the way for many more years of Classics to come.Launching the new section in this issue with her discussion of Homer Smith's 1929 J. Biol. Chem. paper, entitled, ‘The excretion of ammonia and urea by the gills of fish,’ Tammy Rodela from The University of British Columbia, Canada, eloquently discusses Smith's discovery that gills are the site of nitrogen excretion in freshwater fish. Of course we will be featuring other ground-breaking publications in the future, such as August Krogh's 1929 Am. J. Physiol. paper, where he defined the guiding Krogh Principle that underpins the journal's scientific ethos, and the landmark Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B issue in which Charlie Ellington laid the groundwork for all subsequent insect flight biomechanics studies.Having edited almost every JEB Classics article since its inception, I am now looking forward to discovering new classics, working with more inspiring authors and introducing the next generation of integrative biologists and comparative physiologists to the wealth of literature that lies buried in journal archives the world over.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,043 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,016 | 0,010 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,184 | 0,149 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».