Perceptions and experiences of organizational justice among healthcare professionals in academic hospitals in South-eastern Nigeria
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Research on organizational justice in hospitals in African countries are limited despite being important for workforce performance and hospital operational efficiency. This paper investigated perception and experiences of organizational justice among health professionals in academic hospitals in South-east Nigeria. Methods The study was conducted in two teaching hospitals in Enugu State, South-east Nigeria using mixed-methods design. Randomly sampled 360 health professionals (doctors = 105, nurses = 200 and allied health professionals, AHPs = 55) completed an organizational justice (OJ) scale. Additionally, semi-structured, in-depth interview (IDI) with purposively selected 18 health professionals were conducted. Univariate and bivariate statistics and multivariable linear regression were used to analyse quantitative data. Statistical significance was set at alpha 0.05 level. Qualitative data were analysed thematically using NVivo 11 software. Results The findings revealed moderate to high perception of different dimensions of OJ. Doctors showed the highest perception, whereas AHPs had the least perception. Among doctors, age and education predicted distributive justice (adjusted R 2 = 22%); hospital ownership and education predicted procedural justice (adjusted R 2 = 17%); and hospital ownership predicted interactional justice (adjusted R 2 = 42%). Among nurses, age, gender and marital status predicted distributive justice (adjusted R 2 = 41%); hospital ownership, age and gender predicted procedural justice (adjusted R 2 = 28%); and hospital ownership, age, marital status and tenure predicted interactional justice (R 2 = 35%). Among AHPs, marital status predicted distributive justice (adjusted R 2 = 5%), while hospital ownership and tenure predicted interactional justice (adjusted R 2 =15%). Qualitative findings indicate that nurses and AHPs perceive as unfair, differences in pay, access to hospital resources, training, work schedule, participation in decision making and enforcement of policies between doctors and other health professionals due to medical dominance. Overall, supervisors have a culture of limited information sharing with, and disrespectful treatment of, their junior colleagues. Conclusion Addressing specific set of socio-demographic factors that significantly influenced perception of OJ among different categories of health professionals and departure from physician-centred culture would improve perceptions and experiences of organizational justice among health professionals in Nigeria and similar settings.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle