Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In contrast to the Industrial Revolution, the Digital Revolution is happening much more quickly. For example, in 1946, the world’s first programmable computer, the Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer (ENIAC), stood 10 feet tall, stretched 150 feet wide, cost millions of dollars, and could execute up to 5,000 operations per second. Twenty- five years later, Intel packed 12 times ENIAC’s processing power into a 12–square-millimeter chip. Today’s personal computers with Pentium processors perform in excess of 400 million instructions per second. Database systems, a subfield of computer science, has also met with notable accelerated advances. A major strength of database systems is their ability to store volumes of complex, hierarchical, heterogeneous, and time-variant data and to provide rapid access to information while correctly capturing and reflecting database updates. Together with the advances in database systems, our relationship with data has evolved from the prerelational and relational period to the data-warehouse period. Today, we are in the knowledge-discovery and data-mining (KDDM) period where the emphasis is not so much on identifying ways to store data or on consolidating and aggregating data to provide a single, unified perspective. Rather, the emphasis of KDDM is on sifting through large volumes of historical data for new and valuable information that will lead to competitive advantage. The evolution to KDDM is natural since our capabilities to produce, collect, and store information have grown exponentially. Debit cards, electronic banking, e-commerce transactions, the widespread introduction of bar codes for commercial products, and advances in both mobile technology and remote sensing data-capture devices have all contributed to the mountains of data stored in business, government, and academic databases. Traditional analytical techniques, especially standard query and reporting and online analytical processing, are ineffective in situations involving large amounts of data and where the exact nature of information one wishes to extract is uncertain. Data mining has thus emerged as a class of analytical techniques that go beyond statistics and that aim at examining large quantities of data; data mining is clearly relevant for the current KDDM period. According to Hirji (2001), data mining is the analysis and nontrivial extraction of data from databases for the purpose of discovering new and valuable information, in the form of patterns and rules, from relationships between data elements. Data mining is receiving widespread attention in the academic and public press literature (Berry & Linoff, 2000; Fayyad, Piatetsky-Shapiro, & Smyth, 1996; Kohavi, Rothleder, & Simoudis, 2002; Newton, Kendziorski, Richmond, & Blattner, 2001; Venter, Adams, & Myers, 2001; Zhang, Wang, Ravindranathan, & Miles, 2002), and case studies and anecdotal evidence to date suggest that organizations are increasingly investigating the potential of data-mining technology to deliver competitive advantage.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».