Physico-Chemical Characterizationof Aphron Based Drilling Fluids
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The colloidal gas aphron (CGA) based drilling fluids are designed to minimize formation damage by blocking pores of the rock with microbubbles, which can later be removed easily when the well is open for production. Sizing CGA bubbles in accordance with the rock pore size distribution is essential for effective sealing of the pores during drilling. The physical properties (i.e. viscosity, density, fluid loss, etc.) of the CGA based drilling fluids also need to be understood in order to drill with these fluids more effectively. In this study, the physical properties of colloidal gas aphron based drilling fluids are investigated. The results of rheology, API filtration loss and density measurement testsusing various CGA based drilling fluid formulations are presented. The effects of polymer and surfactant concentration, surfactant type, shear rate, mixing time and water quality onthe CGA bubble size have been studied. Results of CGA bubble size characterization experiments are also reported. Introduction The colloidal gas aphron (CGA) based drilling fluids have recently been used for drilling at-balance in order to eliminate the problems associated with overbalanced and underbalanced drilling. In order to achieve an at-balance drilling situation, the fluid pressure must be maintained at a level greater than the formation pressure, but the difference should be kept at a minimum level to avoid invasion of the fluid into the formation1. Colloidal gas aphron drilling fluid simulates such asituation by building a bridge in front of the pores of the rock. This bridge is believed to be stabilizing the rock while allowing minimal damage to the formation. This system has been successfully implemented in high-angle and horizontal well drilling in highly depleted reservoirs2 as well as with vertical wells. Simply put, aphrons are bubbles, approximately 10 – 100 microns in diameter. The term colloidal gas aphrons was first used by Sebba3. Like regular foams, aphrons are typically composed of a gaseous (Colloidal Gas Aphrons) or liquid spherical (Polyaphron) core. Unlike foams, however, aphrons have a thin aqueous protective shell. Aphron stability is determined by the rate of mass transfer between the viscous water shell and the bulk phase. This transfer is known as the Marangoni effect3–5. If the mass transfer rate is high, aphrons will be unstable. Therefore, the shell fluid is designed to have certain viscosity to minimize the Marangoni effect. The shell is composed of an inner layer and an outer layer. Figure 1 illustrates a typical aphron. The inner layer consists of surfactant molecules which supports and separates the air core from the viscous layer. The outer layer which also supports the viscous layer is hydrophobic outwards and hydrophilic inwards. Since this bubble is in contact with the bulk water, itis believed that there is another layer in which the surfactant molecules are hydrophobic inwards and hydrophilic outwards. This indicates that there is a region in between the aphronouter shell and the bulk phase layer where a hydrophobic globule will be comfortable and, therefore, oil will adhere to the gas aphron3.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle