Reply by Authors
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
No AccessJournal of UrologyReview Article1 Jun 2020Reply by Authors Hanan Goldberg, Ardalan E. Ahmad, Thenappan Chandrasekar, Laurence Klotz, Mark Emberton, Masoom A. Haider, Samir S. Taneja, Karan Arora, Neil Fleshner, Antonio Finelli, Nathan Perlis, Mark D. Tyson, Zachary Klaassen, and Christopher J. D. Wallis Hanan GoldbergHanan Goldberg *Correspondence: Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9Canada ( E-mail Address: [email protected] Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Urology Department, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York , Ardalan E. AhmadArdalan E. Ahmad Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada , Thenappan ChandrasekarThenappan Chandrasekar Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , Laurence KlotzLaurence Klotz Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada , Mark EmbertonMark Emberton Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom , Masoom A. HaiderMasoom A. Haider Department of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada , Samir S. TanejaSamir S. Taneja Department of Urology and Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York , Karan AroraKaran Arora Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona , Neil FleshnerNeil Fleshner Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada , Antonio FinelliAntonio Finelli Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada , Nathan PerlisNathan Perlis Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada , Mark D. TysonMark D. Tyson Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona , Zachary KlaassenZachary Klaassen Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta, Georgia , and Christopher J. D. WallisChristopher J. D. Wallis Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000595.02AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Reply by Authors." The Journal of Urology, 203(6), p. 1093 References 1. : Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging to rule-in and rule-out clinically important prostate cancer in men at risk: a cohort study. Urol Int 2011; 87: 49. Google Scholar 2. : Cost-effectiveness of MR imaging–guided strategies for detection of prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men. Radiology 2017; 285: 157. Google Scholar No direct or indirect commercial, personal, academic, political, religious or ethical incentive is associated with publishing this article. © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue 6June 2020Page: 1093-1093 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Hanan Goldberg Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Urology Department, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York *Correspondence: Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9Canada ( E-mail Address: [email protected] Equal study contribution. More articles by this author Ardalan E. Ahmad Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Equal study contribution. More articles by this author Thenappan Chandrasekar Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania More articles by this author Laurence Klotz Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Mark Emberton Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom Supported by the United Kingdom National Institute for Health Research UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre. More articles by this author Masoom A. Haider Department of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Samir S. Taneja Department of Urology and Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York More articles by this author Karan Arora Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona More articles by this author Neil Fleshner Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Antonio Finelli Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Nathan Perlis Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Mark D. Tyson Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona More articles by this author Zachary Klaassen Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta, Georgia More articles by this author Christopher J. D. Wallis Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Expand All No direct or indirect commercial, personal, academic, political, religious or ethical incentive is associated with publishing this article. Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,040 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,019 | 0,023 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,082 | 0,065 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».