MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4239726285 · doi:10.2979/victorianstudies.58.3.33

[sans titre]

2016· article· W4239726285 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jordanna Bailkin

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAustralian History and Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEmigrationOfficerEmpireHistoryWelfareSociologyLawEconomic historyGender studiesPolitical scienceAncient history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Empire’s Children: Child Emigration, Welfare, and the Decline of the British World, 1869–1967 by Ellen Boucher Jordanna Bailkin (bio) Empire’s Children: Child Emigration, Welfare, and the Decline of the British World, 1869–1967, by Ellen Boucher; pp. xi + 292. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014, £69.99, £21.99 paper, $110.00, $32.99 paper. In 1949, John Bicknell, a nine-year-old boy in a Barnardo’s branch home in Sussex, heard an officer give an excruciatingly dull speech about the merits of child emigration. After hearing from another boy that Australian children rode horses to school and being asked by the officer if he was interested in the emigration scheme, Bicknell thought, “‘Bloody hell, I’d love a horse to ride to school on. So I immediately put my hand up . . . and everything went from there’” (196). This emigration became an opportunity for Bicknell to remake himself, insisting on changing his name from “Richard” to “John” and ultimately coming to label himself as an Australian. Such stories enrich and enliven Boucher’s Empire’s Children: Child Emigration, Welfare, and the Decline of the British World, 1869–1967, a well-crafted history of the roughly 95,000 boys and girls selected between 1869 and 1967 by government-funded charities for permanent relocation to Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Southern Rhodesia. The children were drawn from working-class households in Britain’s major cities and groomed in the settler colonies for a rural lifestyle. Boucher offers a nuanced [End Page 589] portrait of the complex identities that were forged through emigration: both in terms of how these children thought about themselves and with regard to how they were imagined by others. Her sensitive account helps us grasp the historically specific exigencies and ambitions that made parents and states believe that child emigration was plausible and even desirable. The book begins with an examination of the effect of child emigration on late Victorian culture, puzzling out what made this option acceptable (even if wrenching) for poor families. As Boucher persuasively relates, child emigration was a product of the prevailing Victorian tendency to understand Britishness as an ethnic and spiritual core that required careful cultivation to achieve its full potential. Emigration policies rested on a vision of mutual development in which needy children would grow fit and strong from the hearty, outdoor lifestyle of the settler colonies, while the reach of British settlement would be extended. As Boucher points out, such policies rested on a distinctive view of the settler Empire as a redemptive space, in which destitute children might attain a higher degree of social mobility than they would have in Britain. Boucher turns next to the interwar generation and to the shifts that took place in child emigration policies during the 1920s and 1930s. Emigration was spurred not only by a new vision of economic stabilization, but also by physiological claims that focused on children’s responsiveness to their environments. Sunshine and open air were valorized over emotional ties and parental nurturing. The objective of developing the British world superseded Victorian narratives about redeeming the children of the poor, and deprived children became political assets who held measurable imperial value—calculated, as Boucher tells us, at £1,000 a head. As Boucher rightly notes, medical praise for the rural life linked up neatly with the demographic imperatives of settlement. In subsequent chapters, Boucher focuses on the growing racial nationalism of Australia and Southern Rhodesia in the 1920s, and on the intersection between child emigration policies and eugenic discourses about “fit” children. She examines the deep contradictions of child emigration, in which children who were promised social mobility were in fact schooled to be compliant with orders and deferential to authority. Idealism about the social and professional opportunities for child migrants faded, and children who were sent to Australia were limited to manual work. Boucher offers a vivid portrait of life in schools and homes for migrant children, where, as one child migrant recalled, “‘always somewhere in the cottage somebody was being thrashed with a strap’” (113). Indeed, it would have been helpful to learn more about the perspectives of settler colonials, such as...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,322
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,000

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0060,004
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,6780,591

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,083
Tête enseignante GPT0,356
Écart entre enseignants0,273 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian StudiesMême sujetAustralian History and SocietyTravaux en français237 207