MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4240089407 · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00752_12_6.x

Editorial

2003· editorial· en· W4240089407 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Clinical Nursing · 2003
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAcademic Writing and Publishing
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAudience measurementEditorial boardScope (computer science)Library scienceStyle (visual arts)Public relationsHistoryPsychologyPolitical scienceEngineering ethicsMedical educationMedicineComputer scienceLawEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This is the last editorial for 2003 and it marks the beginning of a few changes in style and format of JCN, which will become apparent in 2004. The most obvious change will be to the cover of the journal which will change colour to a more striking shade of blue – a superficial change, admittedly – and a more open and contemporary style of formatting within the papers. Changes of more substance will include the structuring of abstracts to make clear what the papers are contributing to their fields, and specifically, their relevance to clinical practice. While the main features of JCN will remain, we hope to generate more comment on papers and to regenerate the Clinical Notes section, thus providing for articles on clinical practice which do not necessarily follow the standard original research or review format. The Guidelines for Contributors have been revised to accommodate these changes and the Aims and Scope of JCN have been updated to clarify the purpose and focus of the journal. By the time of publication of the first issue of 2004 there will be some changes to the Editorial Board to ensure that JCN continues to be represented by, and gain the expertise of, the best people in nursing across the world. In addition, to represent the growing international content and readership of JCN, we have succeeded in appointing Assistant Editors for North America and the Southern Hemisphere. Dr Elaine Amella from the Medical University of South Carolina, USA, will become the Assistant Editor for North America and Professor Merilyn Annells from La Trobe University, Australia, will become Assistant Editor for the Southern Hemisphere. In addition, Professor Kader Parahoo from the University of Ulster in Northern Ireland, UK, will become Assistant Editor for Research in brief. Another important development in 2004 will be the publication of eight issues of JCN (an increase from six), providing an extra 11% of material. This reflects the increasing number of manuscripts submitted to JCN and the concomitant acceptance of papers by JCN. To accommodate this we have more than doubled our number of referees. We are also clear that JCN is maintaining its clinical focus and a survey of the contents from 2000 to 2002 showed that all of the papers could be classified clinically with the majority concerned with specific disorders and diseases (27.9%); patient problems (24.4%) and workforce issues (20.2%). The remainder was composed of papers on specific patient groups, specific clinical areas and clinical procedures. The international content of JCN is increasing: most published papers continue to come from the UK with Scandinavia and several countries including Hong Kong, Korea and Taiwan making up the majority. However, unlike in the period 1996–2002 when there were no papers from North America, in 2003 we published three papers from the US and Canada and one from South America. In addition to the above changes, Blackwell Publishing is delighted to announce that in 2004 subscribers to JCN will also receive two issues of International Journal of Older People Nursing (OPN). This prelaunch of OPN, in association with JCN, represents an important step for JCN, as it will play a key role in the future launch of this much needed publication. In particular, it is clear that the reputation and profile of JCN will introduce this new publication to an influential international readership. OPN will be edited by Professor Brendan McCormack of the University of Ulster and Professor Jan Reed of the University of Northumbria, both of whom have formidable reputations in research and practice development in the field of gerontological nursing. OPN welcomes scholarly papers on all aspects of older people nursing including policy, management, education and research related to practice. Furthermore, it will help nurses engage in the debates about the health and social care context of services for older people, by providing scholarly and accessible material that will challenge assumptions and provoke new ideas, set within an overall aim of developing nursing practice. It will provide nurses, who work with older people, with access to key resources to inform practice at a variety of levels. For more information on OPN, please contact the editors at: [email protected] The Editor, Assistant Editors and Editorial Board of JCN are privileged to be associated with this exciting development and wish the editors of OPN every success. Returning to JCN, the years ahead present many challenges. The increasing internationalization of nursing, the increasing amount of research and scholarship in nursing and increasing competition from high quality publications for the output from this activity have to be met ‘head on’. If you wish to be involved with JCN by writing, refereeing papers or reviewing books then please contact the Editorial Office at: [email protected]

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,025
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,062
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,025
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,389
Écart entre enseignants0,341 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle