Proceedings of the joint international and annual ERCIM workshops on Principles of software evolution (IWPSE) and software evolution (Evol) workshops
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
IWPSE-Evol'09 merges the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE) and the annual ERCIM Workshop on Software Evolution (Evol), and is the premier event dedicated to software evolution in 2009. To celebrate the 10th anniversary of IWPSE, the 5th anniversary of the ERCIM evolution workshop, and the 20th anniversary of ERCIM itself, we have chosen to join forces by organising a common event at ESEC/FSE 2009, under the special theme "The Future of Software Evolution". We explicitly solicited submissions that take a historical perspective on a particular facet of software evolution research, practice or education, argue for the current challenges, and speculate on what the future might bring. We received 36 submissions, 20 of which were full papers. The short papers comprised 14 position papers and 2 tool papers. We asked authors to classify their submissions according to 15 topics, in order to facilitate matching with the expertise of the program committee members. Every paper could be classified in more than one topic. To give an idea of current research in software evolution, we list the six most popular topics: Processes, paradigms and methodologies for software evolution (14 papers)Measuring, analysing and visualising evolution (11 papers)Empirical studies and experience reports (10 papers)Consistency management and impact analysis (7 papers)History and future of software evolution (the workshop's theme); applying software evolution (each topic with 6 papers) After peer review and discussion of the submitted papers by an international program committee of experts in the field, only 10 full papers and 8 short papers were accepted. As can be seen from the table of contents of these proceedings, the accepted papers cover a very wide range of issues, from specific techniques to cope with software evolution to infrastructure that facilitates research in this field, and approaches, from formal to empirical. We hope that these proceedings will serve as a valuable reference for future software evolution researchers and for developers facing the problems of ever-changing software systems. Given the historical perspective of this year's edition of the joint workshop, the program chairs invited Takuya Katayama (Professor at the Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology), the founding father of the IWPSE workshop series, and Tom Mens (Professor at the University of Mons, Belgium), the chair and founding father of the ERCIM Working Group on Software Evolution, to give anniversary talks on IWPSE and EVOL, respectively. They accepted the challenge to look back on the history of IWPSE and the ERCIM Working Group, and to highlight future opportunities for software evolution research. We are also delighted that Hausi Müller (Professor at the University of Victoria, Canada) accepted our invitation to give a keynote talk on a particular field of software evolution that has seen quite some activity in recent years: run-time evolution to enable autonomic systems that self-adapt to changing environments.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,013 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,097 | 0,039 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».