Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We met in Ottawa—my brother Ronald and I from Los Angeles and my sister Nuria Nono from Venice—to inaugurate the Canadian presentation of a multimedia exhibition that we had produced about our father, in the hope that it would inspire others to learn about his life and works. Professor James Wright invited us to Ottawa to open the exhibition, which he had rescued from the east coast of the United States, and to attend a concert series and symposium devoted to our father's work, hosted by Carleton University. We were all impressed by the schedule of events and felt that through the comprehensive presentation of lectures, concerts, and the exhibition, others would have the opportunity to experience the breadth of our father's life and works. Professor Wright had not only transferred the multi-media exhibition to Canada but had organized an imposing series of events that would encourage the performance and study of Arnold Schoenberg's compositions. Canada has a history of being Schoenbergfriendly (one thinks of the film producer Larry Weinstein, and, of course, Glenn Gould, among others), and our family was delighted to accept this invitation to take part in the events, and to visit Ottawa for the first time. The presentations by participants from Canada, the United States, Austria, and Australia were consistently engaging and excellent. As a non-musicologist, I acknowledge that I prefer listening to music about words rather than words about music . But the combination of lectures and performances resulted in an altogether satisfying and music-enhancing experience. Our family contribution included the opportunity to add a personal touch to the proceedings by discussing our early memories of growing up in Los Angeles. Following the chamber music theme we were able to recall the many visiting performers and ensembles that had performed in our home. But we also revealed the music that we sang together—our ladies club and gentleman's anthems, of course composed by our father, and a special song that he had written for Nuria (the “Nullele-Pullele” lied). And we had the opportunity to discuss and display the many games that he made for us, the tennis scoring system which he developed for my brother in order to help them both analyze the match, and some of his “tinkering” inventions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,376 | 0,263 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».