MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4240516734 · doi:10.1353/uni.2004.0027

Editors' Introduction

2004· article· en· W4240516734 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
George Bodmer, Lissa Paul, Jan Susina

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œLion and the unicorn · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNarrativeGeorge (robot)SociologyRhetorical questionIdentity (music)HistoryLiteratureMedia studiesArt historyArtAesthetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Editors’ Introduction George Bodmer, Lissa Paul, and Jan Susina This issue of The Lion and the Unicorn includes six essays that address a wide range of children's and adolescent texts, from the use of voice in identity formation in George MacDonald's fantasy novels, to the postcolonial perspective on Greenland's Inuit and their Scandinavian colonizers offered in Mette Newth's historical fiction. A quick review of the titles of the essays on the back cover of the journal might suggest six independent essays, but there is a surprising amount of overlapping critical concerns posed by the authors. These essays fit together surprisingly well and the authors speak to one another at many junctures. Megan Norcia, Rocío Davis, and Christina Desai examine the production of ethnic and national identity. Similar to Norcia and Davis, Hilary Crew shows how contemporary children's and adolescent texts are used to revise, or reintroduce, cultural histories that have been concealed or erased. Karen Keely discusses how a popular children's author used her children's texts and public personality to promote social issues. Ruth Jenkins traces the use of voice and language in shaping adolescent identity formation in George MacDonald's Princess books, while Desai analyzes how Allen Say's illustrations in The Boy of the Three-Year Nap, El Chino, and Emma's Rug provide a subtle and oftentimes ironic gloss to texts' exploration of the Asian American experience. Using Laurence Yep's Dragonwings as her primary example, Davis studies the ways contemporary Asian American writers use historical fiction to empower children through messages of validation and self-representation. Confronting aspects of a concealed historical past is also at the heart of Crew's study of issues of colonialism in Mette Newth's harrowing young adult novels The Abduction and The Transformation. Using the frame of Postcolonial Studies, Crew shows how the Norwegian author constructs a history that is absent from the discussion of Robert Peary and his arctic expeditions in most informational books published for younger readers. Keely's essay provides a careful historical [End Page v] contextualization of the ways in which Jean Webster's Daddy-Long-Legs and Dear Enemy use the adventures in an orphanage to enter the public discussion and debate concerning the use of eugenics. Keely shows how Webster was a moderate in her approach to eugenics and sought to improve environments, but also supported laws mandating involuntary sterilization and segregation of the mentally disabled. Norcia reads L. T. Meade's Four on an Island as a clever revision of the adventure tale, as popularized by Daniel Defoe's Robinson Crusoe and numerous subsequent Robinsonnades, as a domestic enterprise featuring the female Adventurous Angel as Crusoe's appropriate heir in the process of empire building through the maintenance of domestic space. These form a lively group of essays that provide surprising and new ways of thinking about children's and adolescent texts. We thank the authors for contributing them to L&U. In February 2004, the online version of the Chronicle of Higher Education chose to feature Kevin Shortsleeve's "The Wonderful World of the Depression: Disney, Despotism, and the 1930s: Or, Why Disney Scares Us," which appeared in the January 2004 issue of L&U, as one of its scholarly articles of the day. Shortly after the publication of the April 2004 L&U special issue on "Children and Science Fiction" edited by Janice Bogstad and Michael Levy, it was pleasant to open up the May 2004 issue of PMLA and find a special issue on "Science Fiction and Literary Studies." Great journals think alike. L&U is working on a couple of other special issues in the future. These include one on "Handmade Literacies," edited by Michael Joseph and Lissa Paul, and another based on papers from the Children's Literature International Summer School and Symposium, edited by Kimberley Reynolds. Perhaps one day PMLA will publish a special issue on "Children's Literature and Literary Studies." Maybe if the editors at PMLA read L&U editorial board member Beverly Lyon Clark's Kiddie Lit: The Cultural Construction of Children's Literature in America (Johns Hopkins, 2003), they will. We are interested in receiving...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,911
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,506

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,193
Écart entre enseignants0,186 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œLion and the unicornMême sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207