Formação por meio dos IRDI com pais e professores: uma parceria possível na Educação Infantil
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The family-school relationship is historically surrounded by conflicts, evidenced in the period in which the small child depends significantly on both the care of the parents and the teachers, becoming a growing concern in Early Childhood Education.The research carried out in the field of Day Care Institutions found situations of rivalry and blame, effects of the ambivalent relationship that parents and educators establish among each other in the division of responsibilities and functions related to the baby, fundamentally when entering the institution.Given this scenario, the study formulated a model to mediate the approximation of parents and teachers, which also acts as a trigger for reflections concerning their influence on the development and the psychic constitution of the child.For this, a training was methodologically proposed through the CDRI (Child Development Risk Indicators), articulated to the principles of Therapeutic Education, both based on the psychoanalytic theory.On the parents' side, it was found that the formation promoted debates among them regarding their educational functions, the meanings attributed to the child and their effects on the relationship with the children.It was also found that this training also helped some parents to request help, when detecting some suffering of psychic order, or in the investigation of some organic affection in the child.On the Day Care Institutions, it was found that the teachers have appropriated of their training, based on their own knowledge and skills, finding means to assist the babies who concerned them, considering the singularity and the needs of each one individually, although they were inserted in a collective field.The study allowed the establishment of guiding principles for the construction of a possible partnership between parents and teachers, building a network of care and promoting a subjectivist education for the young child.The thesis presents the foundations of a treatment in the relationships between parents and teachers in Early Childhood Education, in order to prevent that there are no ruptures in this relationship and, consequently, this could help in the promotion of mental health in the time of early childhood.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».