MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4240590937 · doi:10.1149/ma2018-01/20/1282

Prediction of Ce(III) Electrodeposition at Various Electrochemical Conditions in Molten LiCl-KCl Eutectic

2018· article· en· W4240590937 sur OpenAlexaff
Young Taek Jee, Jong-Il Yun

Notice bibliographique

RevueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineChemical Engineering
ThématiqueMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
Établissements canadiensKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEutectic systemMolten saltOverpotentialElectrowinningElectrochemistryElectrolysisAnhydrousUraniumElectrodeElectrolyteMaterials scienceReference electrodeChemistryInorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MetallurgyChromatographyAlloy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Molten salt is one of the widely used liquid media for a selective extraction through electrolysis. In the nuclear industry, pyroprocessing which utilizes LiCl-KCl molten salt in its core unit processes is suggested as a candidate of non-proliferative fuel recycling process. In an electrorefiner, the uranium metal is selectively collected on a solid electrode through the electrochemical reduction of uranium ion dissolved in LiCl-KCl. The deposit shows a dendritic characteristic which dramatically increases an electroactive surface area of the working electrode. As the surface area increases, current density decreases, and the overall electrochemical condition including potential gradient and exchange current along the diffusion layer is, therefore, changed as well in a real time. Despite of its critical influence on the precision of process simulation, there is no model which reflects this transient change of the electrode. In this work, cerium is selected as a surrogate of uranium. Its behaviors of electrodeposition at various conditions (time, current, concentration, and overpotential) are investigated, and a methodology for quantitative prediction of deposit formation on the working electrode is suggested. All sample preparation and experiments were carried out in a glove box filled with high purity argon gas (99.9999 % Ar, [H2O] and [O2] < 1ppm). Oxidation or hydrolysis was completely avoided in advance. 44 wt.% of LiCl and 56 wt.% of KCl (both 99 % purity, anhydrous, Sigma-Aldrich) were mixed for the preparation of LiCl-KCl eutectic. This eutectic and CeCl3 (99.99 % purity, anhydrous, Sigma-Aldrich) were put together into an alumina crucible. This sample was placed in a high temperature furnace which sustained the temperature 773 ± 2 K. Two 1 mm diameter tungsten rods were used as working and counter electrodes, and a silver wire was immersed in 1 wt.% AgCl-LiCl-KCl as the reference electrode. All electrochemical experiments were performed with a potentiostat (Autolab, PGSTAT302N). Prior to the electrodeposition, cyclic voltammetry (CV) was measured to obtain redox peak of cerium and to check the existence of impurity in a system. Then chronoamperometry (CA) was carried out at a fixed potential of -2.05 V (vs. 1 wt.% Ag/AgCl), which is slightly more negative value than that of the reduction peak for successful electrodeposition. As shown in Figure 1, CA plots showed three different characteristics as the concentration of Ce(III) increased. At low concentration (< 0.45 wt.%, black plots), almost constant or gradual increase of current flow was observed. On the other hand, at high concentration (0.48 wt.% >, red plots), the magnitude of current flow increased drastically with illustrating clear linear slope. Therefore, it can be interpreted that, under the same condition of applied potential, the larger the concentration, the greater the current flow due to more electroactive species around the electrode, and thus the larger the growth of the surface area with the larger amount of electrodeposition. At the concentration between 0.45 wt.% and 0.48 wt.% of Ce(III), the CA plot expressed an intermediate behavior which can be shifted from one to the other characteristic at any time depending on the formation of deposit. Even though the CA plots showed different characteristics based on the concentration parameter, they all sketched linear trend. The amount of charge transferred which corresponded to the amount of metal deposit was able to be expressed as a function of time with slope and y-intercept. The slopes of CA plots at high concentration condition were directly proportional to the concentration. The y-intercept, the first plateau of CA plot, could be defined from the current of reduction peak of CV, which is proportional to the concentration. The current signal of reduction peak was affected by immersed depth of working electrode and overpotential. In conclusion, under assumption of no physical detachment or loss of electrodeposit, the preliminary prediction of the amount of electrodeposit was possible with three parameters (time, concentration, and overpotential) which were substantially related to the determination of induced current during CA experiment. This prediction should be achieved in a scrupulous way with consideration of concentration parameter because of different behaviors of electrodeposition. Figure 1

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,228
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueECS Meeting AbstractsMême sujetMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processesTravaux en français237 207