MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4240645377 · doi:10.1353/gss.2018.0025

A Message from the Editor

2018· article· en· W4240645377 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
G.R. Kline

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of global south studies · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Policy and Governance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAllianceTreatyPraisePolitical scienceGeneral partnershipEuropean unionValue (mathematics)Economic historyHistoryEconomyPolitical economyLawInternational tradeSociologyEconomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A Message from the Editor Gary Kline Arguably, a tectonic shift of sorts is under way globally as a result of actions taken in the name of the United States by the Trump administration. The president seems determined to sweep away the architecture of the Western Alliance that has been so meticulously built over the past seven decades. So far, these actions do not rise to the level of discernible policies or a coherent replacement strategy. Their consequences will nevertheless be profound and enduring; they may affect relations between all of the world’s countries for generations to come. Countries of the Global South will in some ways enter uncharted territory, with all of the potentials and pitfalls implied therein. In the name of “making America great again,” Donald Trump has withdrawn from or repudiated the Paris Climate Accord, the North American Free Trade Agreement, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, initiatives the United States originally championed; abrogated the Iran nuclear deal; harshly criticized traditional allies such as Germany, France, Australia, Mexico, Canada, and Great Britain; denigrated the value of the North American Treaty Organization and the Group of Seven; exhorted countries in the European Union to pull out; demeaned non-Western countries using profane pejoratives; and launched an incipient trade war with our closest allies, based on a claim that the European Union and Canada constitute security threats to the United States. Meanwhile, he has lavished praise on (first and foremost) Russia’s Putin, ostensibly taking him at his word that he did not meddle in US elections in 2016, despite the unanimous findings to the contrary of seventeen intelligence agencies in his own government; and Turkey’s Erdogan, the Philippines’ Duterte, North Korea’s Kim, and other “strong leaders.” Under the current administration, the United States has increased military spending and cut funds to the State Department. Bluster and belligerence have supplanted diplomacy. Many career diplomats have left the department and vacancies are being left unfilled. [End Page ix] From such an obvious pattern, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the United States has downgraded its commitment to the core, guiding values of democracy, rule of law, and human rights. Vladimir Putin seems to be reveling in the success of his efforts to undermine the Western alliance and to sow public mistrust and discord abroad, thereby eroding democratic institutions, most especially in the United States. Likewise, the consensus in China seems to be that the United States is withdrawing from its leadership role (drained by intractable quagmires such as Afghanistan and Iraq and government dysfunction and gridlock) and that the West is in steady, ineluctable decline. In their view, they are poised to inherit global leadership in time. The Belt and Road Initiative is a major signifier of this trend. Already, global alliances are frayed and in flux and relations between China, Russia, and the United States and the countries of the Global South, have been transmogrified. For good or ill, change is here, and the countries of the world must find a new path forward in order to construct a more peaceful and just world. The challenges are enormous and the outcome is not inevitable but depends on concrete activities of everyday people working together. Many keen observers have noted that when people feel threatened they tend to band together into familiar groups (based on appeals to ethnicity, nationality, religion, etc.) resulting in a growing “tribalism.” This trend is fracturing countries around the globe. This phenomenon has undoubtedly been exacerbated by the turmoil caused by a dramatic increase in refugees fleeing wars, violence, oppression, and natural disasters—more than sixteen million last year alone and over sixty-five million in total. I would argue that widespread conditions of stark and growing inequality are at the root of most of these problems. Tribalism, then, may be one response to this widespread, destabilized environment. However, other responses are possible and (in my opinion) preferable. Let us remove ourselves momentarily from the particulars of the formidable problems we face and reflect on our common predicament. In the scheme of things, we—Homo sapiens sapiens, who are descendants of the same ancestral mother from East Africa—share space on an...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,040
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,135

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,037
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0070,005
Science ouverte0,0030,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0180,027
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0400,030

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,340
Écart entre enseignants0,311 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of global south studiesMême sujetCanadian Policy and GovernanceTravaux en français237 207