Gene Expression Signatures That Delineate Biologic and Prognostic Subgroups in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 679 Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) represents approximately 10–12% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the Western world, with a higher incidence in Asian populations. The World Health Organization classification recognizes a number of distinctive subtypes of PTCL including angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL), extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma of nasal type (ENKTCL), and many other rare entities that present mainly as extranodal PTCL. However, with current immunophenotypic and molecular markers, about 30–50% of PTCL cases are not classifiable and are categorized as PTCL-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS). With the exception of ALK(+)ALCL, the PTCLs generally have a poor outcome and, thus a better understanding of the biology of these diseases is greatly needed to improve the long-term survival of these patients. Methods: In the current study, we performed gene expression profiling analysis on a large and well- characterized series of PTCL and ENKTCL cases (n=372) from the Lymphoma Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project (LLMPP), the International Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma Project (IPTCL) and other major institutions to define robust molecular classifiers, oncogenic pathways and prognosticators for the more common PTCL entities, as well as unique molecular and prognostic subgroups within PTCL-NOS. Molecular signatures for diagnosis and prognosis were generated in training data sets and validated in separate cohorts. Results: Robust molecular classifiers for AITL, two types of systemic ALCL (ALK(+) and ALK(-)), ATLL and ENKTCL were identified (Figure 1). These classifiers reflect the pathobiology of the tumor cells, as well as their microenvironment, and represent a refinement of what we reported previously (Iqbal et.al Blood, 2010; Iqbal et.al Leukemia. 2011). Importantly, ALK(-)ALCL can be differentiated from ALK(+)ALCL and PTCL-NOS with a unique gene expression signature. Approximately 14% of PTCL-NOS were re-classified as ALK(-)ALCL and showed expression of CD30 protein, TIA-1 or granzyme B by immunohistochemistry. ENKTCL can be separated molecularly into NK-cell lymphoma and gd-PTCL, the latter of which was also identified in 9% of PTCL-NOS. The remaining PTCL-NOS cases could be separated into two major subgroups related to T-cell differentiation and characterized by either high expression of GATA3 (30%) or TBX21(T-BET) (45%) and many of the corresponding target genes (Figure 2). Cases with high expression of GATA3 had poor overall survival and showed enriched Wnt and mTOR pathways, but no prominent microenvironment signature. The high TBX21 subgroup had a remarkably good outcome for patients with a high plasma cell-like gene expression signature, but poor overall survival when expressing a high cytotoxic signature (Figure 3). The molecular prognosticator for AITL largely reflected the role of the tumor microenvironment, with the presence of a high B-cell signature correlating with favorable outcome, whereas high dendritic cell/monocyte signatures were associated with inferior survival. Conclusion: We have organized the most comprehensive molecular profiling study of PTCL, and have not only refined the molecular diagnostic and prognostic signatures for the common subtypes of PTCL, but also segregated PTCL-NOS in meaningful biological and prognostic subtypes. Molecular diagnostic and prognostic signatures of PTCL frequently include components of the tumor-host interactions, highlighting the importance of the microenvironment in PTCL biology. This study provides an important framework for additional analysis to identify novel therapeutic targets to improve the outcome of patients with PTCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».