Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Community Twenty-Two Years a Slave and Forty Years a Freeman (1857)Approaching Austin Steward (1793-1865) begins with a paradox.While he has been set on par with "the key black nationalist leaders of the antebellum period" such as " [Frederick] Douglass, Henry Highland Garnet, and James McCune Smith" (Hodges xxvii), he has also been called a more marginal, "lesser-known" figure (Pease and Pease, Introduction ix).Historiographical scholarship has dominated this critical reception of Steward.The introduction to the 1969 Addison-Wesley edition (merely reprinted with minor changes in 2004) by Jane Pease and William Pease might serve as an example here.They recognize the narrative's importance as a historical source but fail to identify its literary value.They struggle with the fact that Steward was an "exceptional black man" (xv) who did not, however, correspond to the image of a typical fugitive.Troubled by his autobiography, which lists "[ex-]slave" and "freeman" to describe the same existential condition (liberty), their language represents a conceptual restriction to envision Blacks claiming their identities as freemen-free men-men, when they can still be instrumentalized as ex-slaves-ex slaves-slaves.Graham Russell Hodges's 2002 introduction, while it realizes that freedom for Steward was not merely a disguise, offers little more in in terms of recovering the literary value of Steward's text.He does not resolve the central issue that Steward is part of a nonliterary category, i.e. black political and intellectual leadership, yet chooses a literary expressive mode, the "jeremiad" (xxvii).This chapter attempts to offer a more coherent connection between Steward's narrative as a multifaceted literary text and his cross-border life and activism.More than a chronological narrative of his own life, Austin Steward's narrative represents a mosaic of many different stories.John Ernest, eminent scholar of the slave narrative and African American literature, has described a change in Twenty-Community | 153 identify, in problematic ways at times, the possibilities of alliances with indigenous people for Blacks in a new country.Others still seem to follow goals for the black community that are more complex: in these stories, Steward gives testimony of, becomes a witness to, and works to uphold the memory of black life in slavery and freedom.In this way, these stories reflect diverse experiences on both sides of the border and show the importance of meaningful individuals for the creation and maintenance of a community.The chapters' final section demonstrates how the motif of storytelling can be applied not simply to human individuals but to more abstract entities like Great Britain and Canada West.Steward's numerous border crossings between the United States and Canada West shape the very contradictory impressions of British North America and its suitability for Black fugitives in the pursuit of freedom.While Steward's experiences in the Wilberforce settlement leave him frustrated and prompt his return to his former home in Rochester, NY, his participation in the African Methodist Episcopal (AME) Conferences on both sides of the border a few years later lets him re-experience Canada West under a different vantage point.The visit as part of a religious convention focuses on prominent Canadian symbols of, particularly, Canadian nationalism and pride, without however referencing Steward's previous Canadian years.This curious gap leaves an unresolved picture of Canada West as the "Promised Land" for black settlers as well as of Steward's own changing alliances.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,015 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,012 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,233 | 0,075 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».