MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4240960183 · doi:10.1182/blood.v112.11.44.44

A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide in Previously Untreated, Symptomatic Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

2008· article· en· W4240960183 sur OpenAlexaff
Christine Chen, Harminder Paul, Wei Xu, Vishal Kukreti, Suzanne Trudel, Ellen Wei, Zhihua Li, Joseph Brandwein, Mariela Pantoja, Chungyee Leung-Hagensteijn

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineLenalidomideTumor lysis syndromeInternal medicineMultiple myelomaGastroenterologySepsisChronic lymphocytic leukemiaImmunologyLeukemiaChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory compound known to downregulate VEGF and TNFa, stimulate production of inhibitory cytokines such as IL-2, and modulate activity of T cells and natural killer cells. These effects form the basis for investigation of lenalidomide in CLL. Promising results from studies in relapsed/ refractory CLL have been reported but there are limited data in previously untreated CLL. We present preliminary results from a phase II study of single-agent lenalidomide in previously untreated, symptomatic CLL. Methods: Patients (pts) were eligible if previously untreated (excluding steroids alone for autoimmune cytopenias) and symptomatic (any cytopenias, symptomatic adenopathy/ organomegaly, constitutional symptoms, lymphocyte doubling count <12 mos). The starting dose for lenalidomide was initially 10mg po daily with weekly 5mg dose escalations to the target dose of 25mg daily × 21 days every 28 day cycle. Toxic events in the first 2 pts (tumor lysis requiring dialysis; neutropenic sepsis leading to death) led to a study halt with data safety monitoring board review. Subsequent protocol amendments were implemented to reduce both starting and target doses (2.5mg and 10mg, respectively, days 1–21), slow the dose escalation rate (2.5mg cycle 1, 5mg cycle 2, 10mg cycle 3 and thereon), extend allopurinol tumor lysis prophylaxis to minimum 3 cycles, and increase frequency of tumor lysis lab monitoring. DVT prophylaxis with low dose ASA was mandated. Steroids were allowed for management of tumor flare symptoms as needed. Results: Study accrual has been completed with 25 pts enrolled on the amended protocol. Median age 60 (range 33–78), 10 pts (40%) with Rai stage III-IV, baseline median Hb 119g/L (range 80–173), lymphocytes 88.8×109/L (range 2.8–220), 2M 221 nmol/L (range 139–626; normal <170), bulky nodes 9 pts (36%), organomegaly 23 pts (92%), del17p/del11q on FISH 8 pts (32%), ZAP70 and IgVH mutational status pending. Twenty-three pts have received at least 1 cycle (median 7; range 1–17) and are evaluable for toxicity. Hematologic toxicity: 10 pts (43%) developed Gr 3-4 neutropenia during at least 1 cycle (at doses 2.5–10mg), the most common cause for dose reductions/interruptions. Four pts developed febrile neutropenia. Six pts have required intermittent GCSF support (none requiring routine use). Three pts (13%) developed Gr 3-4 thrombocytopenia (without bleeding). Nonhematologic toxicity: Fatigue (74%), tumor flare (78%), non-desquamating rash (48%) were common, but all Gr1-2. Infections (43%) were mostly minor, non-neutropenic respiratory/sinus/skin infections. Tumor flare presented with painful, enlarged node(s) often associated with nasal congestion, coryza, and scalp pruritis. Most tumor flare symptoms resolved spontaneously but 8 pts required steroids on at least one occasion with prompt resolution. Although tumor flare was most common in the first week on study, repeat flare symptoms with subsequent cycles were noted (30.6% of all 186 cycles). Four pts required hospitalization for febrile neutropenia and/or pneumonia. No further tumor lysis has been noted. Responses: 17 pts have completed at least 3 cycles and are evaluable for response. All patients have achieved stable disease or better: 11 PR (65%) and 6 SD (35%). No patients have progressed to date. Responses were reached at a median of 4 cycles (range 2–15). Although dramatic lymphocyte reductions are seen by as early as week 1 (using lenalidomide dose 2.5mg/d), rebound during cycle days 22–28 off-drug are common. Dose modifications/study withdrawals: Two patients have withdrawn from study due to lack of response after 10 cycles (SD) and prolonged Gr3-4 neutropenia/ thrombocytopenia, respectively. Median daily tolerated dose is 10mg with 26% of pts requiring dose reductions to 5mg (most due to cytopenias). Correlatives: Results from gene expression profiling performed at baseline and cycle 1, day 8 are pending. Conclusion: Preliminary results from this phase II study suggests that lenalidomide has significant activity in previously untreated CLL patients. Using a conservative dosing regimen and careful monitoring, no further tumor lysis has been reported and toxicities such as tumor flare and myelosuppression are manageable. Rebound lymphocytosis with intermittent dosing suggests that low-dose, continuous dosing of lenalidomide may lead to safer, more effective use of this drug in CLL.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,012

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,308
Écart entre enseignants0,282 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207