MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4240999353 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.transcagen-a2-63

Abstract A2-63: Airway gene-coexpression network rewiring in the presence of bronchial dysplasia and lung cancer

2015· article· en· W4240999353 sur OpenAlexaff
Anna M. Tassinari, Bin Zhang, Katrina Steiling, Duncan Whitney, Kate Porta, Stephen Lam, Marc E. Lenburg, Avrum Spira, Jennifer Beane

Notice bibliographique

RevueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Établissements canadiensBC Cancer Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLung cancerCarcinogenesisCancerContext (archaeology)BiomarkerLungDiseasePathologyDysplasiaMedicineLung cancer screeningBiologyCancer researchInternal medicineGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Lung cancer is a deadly disease, killing 160,000 a year in the US. The 5-year survival rate of lung cancer patients is invariably low, partially due to a lack of early diagnoses and limited access to CT screening programs during the early, most-curable stages of the disease. The urgent need for alternative early-stage diagnostics has been addressed in previous work, which focused on smoking- and lung cancer-specific gene expression alterations in cytologically normal airway epithelial cells. These lung cancer associated alterations have been shown to serve as a clinically relevant biomarker for the early detection of lung cancer. In this study, we have expanded upon this work by leveraging gene expression from airway epithelial cells collected in the presence of bronchial premalignant lesions. Specifically, we conducted network-based analyses to further explore alterations in bronchial gene coexpression (GCE) patterns in the uninvolved large airway of patients with tobacco-induced premalignancy and those with lung cancer. By studying airway GCE patterns present in patients with lung cancer and premalignancy, but absent in disease-free smokers, we hope to discover the earliest changes in process of lung carcinogenesis that may serve as novel targets for lung cancer treatment and prevention. Coexpression networks use expression-profile correlations to cluster genes to provide system-wide context for single genes implicated in a disease and elucidate the influence of interconnectedness of cellular components on phenotype. Here, we employed Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to build GCE networks derived from cytologically normal airway epithelial cells obtained from current and former smokers with lung cancer (n=409), dysplastic airway lesions (n=121), and neither condition (n=412). Samples were collected from subjects undergoing white-light bronchoscopy as part of the AEGIS trial by Allegro Dx, or from subjects undergoing autofluorescence bronchoscopy in the British Columbia Lung Health Study. RNA was extracted from cells and profiled on microarrays or by mRNA-Seq. In order to detect and quantify reconfiguration of networks under different disease states, the Modular Differential Connectivity (MDC) measure was calculated to determine the degree of topological similarity between any pair of GCE modules. In addition, Fisher's Exact Test (FET) was used to calculate significance of gene-member overlap between pairs of GCE modules originating from disease networks to distinguish modules conserved in premalignancy and cancer. To identify modules conserved between disease states, but dissimilar from the healthy smoker modules, we focused on those with (a) significant overlap by FET, (b) non-differentiating premalignancy vs. cancer MDC and (c) differentiating normal vs. disease MDC. Hub genes within each network were identified based on intra-modular connectivity, a measure of module essentiality. We prioritized genes with increased connectivity upon entering the premalignant state that remained strong in the lung cancer network. We identified 16 module pairs conserved between disease states, i.e. cancer modules similarly connected (MDC FDR<0.05) and significantly overlapping (pFET<0.01) with premalignancy modules, one of which was weakly connected in the disease-free networks (MDC FDR<0.05). Functional annotation of these modules revealed associations with pathways and transcription factors implicated in carcinogenesis and cell proliferation. Furthermore, we identified two hub genes linked to pathways regulating cigarette smoke-induced signaling and inhibition of lung cancer cell growth. Integration of differential connectivity and GCE network analyses represents a novel approach to discovering pathways associated with early lung carcinogenesis. Our results suggest the occurrence of transcriptomic alterations that arise in patients with premalignancy and remain present in patients with lung cancer. Future work will include experimental validation of these findings. The computational approach outlined above may aid in the identification of candidate master regulators of early lung carcinogenesis that have potential utility both as indicators of increased lung cancer risk and as early-stage drug targets for chemoprevention or therapy. Citation Format: Anna Tassinari, Bin Zhang, Katrina Steiling, Duncan Whitney, Kate Porta, Stephen Lam, Marc Lenburg, Avrum Spira, Jennifer Beane. Airway gene-coexpression network rewiring in the presence of bronchial dysplasia and lung cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Translation of the Cancer Genome; Feb 7-9, 2015; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(22 Suppl 1):Abstract nr A2-63.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,358
Écart entre enseignants0,319 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCancer Research→Même sujetBioinformatics and Genomic Networks→Travaux en français237 207→