Cardiopulmonary, histological and inflammatory alterations after lung contusion in a novel mouse model of blunt chest trauma.: Reply:
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We would like to thank Dr. Guy and Dr. Watkins for their letter and their comments regarding our recently published paper describing a novel mouse model of blunt chest trauma in mice. We also thank the Editors of Shock for the opportunity to respond to this letter. In our experiments, blunt chest trauma was induced using a single blast wave of high intensity centered on the thorax of male C3H/HeN mice. Blast pressure was measured directly at the nozzle of the blast wave generator to assess reproducibility of the blast wave released. The pressure was not determined at the animal's chest because we feel that measuring the intensity of the blast wave that impacts the animal is less informative than biological parameters. Thus, among other measurements, the degree and distribution of lung hemorrhage was estimated macroscopically and microscopically to characterize the trauma. Assessing the distribution of hemorrhage was considered important to monitor whether the trauma consistently caused a bilateral lung contusion. Dr. Guy's and Dr. Watkins' suggestion to determine lung weight ratio and the injury quotient in this model is excellent and will be addressed in future studies. We certainly agree that the observed increase in plasma cytokine concentrations at 3 h following blunt chest trauma is not sufficient to characterize the immunologic response to the trauma, although it suggests a systemic response. As a first step in a series of experiments it was the primary goal of our studies to develop a model of blunt chest trauma in mice because this species is particularly suitable for detailed immunologic investigations. Ongoing work proves that this model is appropriate for such studies and focuses on cell-mediated immune responses and their changes over time. The comments about liver injury are very interesting. Macroscopic as well as microscopic analysis did not reveal significant liver injury at the early time point used in our experiments. In addition, measurement of myeloperoxidase activity in liver tissue did not show any differences between sham and trauma animals, although marked differences occurred in the lungs. An explanation might be that the blast wave primarily affects air-containing structures and was exactly focused on the thorax. During preliminary experiments, however, damage to the liver was observed when the focus of the blast wave was centered too close to the abdomen. Thus, we agree that blunt chest trauma in this model might to some extent have impact on the liver. In this regard, indirect effects of passive downward movement of the diaphragm or deformation of the thorax appear possible. We therefore think that this model should be considered as a model of blunt chest trauma that mimics blunt chest injury as it occurs clinically and includes all pathophysiological components. However, because no fractures occur and collateral injury to soft tissue and abdominal organs is almost absent, we are convinced that the model makes it possible to study the effects of severe bilateral lung contusion. Dr. Markus Knöferl
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».