Inhaled nitric oxide for respiratory failure in preterm infants
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Inhaled nitric oxide has been proven effective in term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure. The pathophysiology of respiratory failure, and the potential risks, differ substantially in preterm infants. Analysis of the efficacy and toxicities of inhaled nitric oxide in infants born before 35 weeks is therefore necessary. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether, in preterm newborn infants (< 35 weeks gestation) who have hypoxic respiratory failure, treatment with inhaled nitric oxide improves oxygenation within 2 hours and reduces the rates of death, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular haemorrhage, or neurodevelopmental disability SEARCH STRATEGY: Standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Healthstar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), using the following keywords: nitric oxide, clinical trial, newborn, and covering years from 1985 to 2005. In addition, we searched the abstracts of the Pediatric Academic Societies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi randomised studies in preterm infants with hypoxic respiratory failure. Administration of inhaled nitric oxide compared to control with or without placebo. Clinically relevant outcomes that were analysed included death, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (defined as oxygen dependence at 36 weeks postconceptional age), intraventricular haemorrhage, long term neurodevelopmental outcome and short term effects on oxygenation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used. Two investigators extracted, assessed and coded separately all data for each study. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion. MAIN RESULTS: Seven randomised controlled trials of inhaled nitric oxide therapy in preterm infants were found. One study consisted of infants determined to have a high risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (Subhedar 1997). One study studied routine use of inhaled NO in all ventilated preterm infants (Schreiber 2003). The remaining studies consisted of infants with high predicted mortality based on poor oxygenation (Kinsella 1999; Hascoet 2005; INNOVO 2005; Van Meurs 2005; Mercier 1999). No significant effect of inhaled nitric oxide on mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia was demonstrated. There was no evidence of effect on the risk of intraventricular haemorrhage. There may be short term improvements in oxygenation. Two studies (Schreiber 2003; INNOVO 2005) have so far presented data on long term neurodevelopmental outcome, one of which demonstrated improved outcome at two years corrected age. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The currently published evidence from randomised trials does not support the use of inhaled nitric oxide in preterm infants with hypoxic respiratory failure. Further studies may need to be performed to evaluate the potential benefit of routine use of this therapy in infants with milder forms of respiratory failure, and these trials will need to be designed to evaluate not only neonatal survival, and the occurrence of neonatal morbidities, but should be powered to evaluate neurodevelopmental outcome at a minimum of two years of age.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».