MétaCan
← tous les travaux

An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements

2002· article· en· 1 007 citations· W4241535693 sur OpenAlex· 10.1249/00005768-200204000-00020

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Porte sur le CanadaSon objet est le Canada, où que soient ses auteurs.

Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Résumé

MIRWALD, R. L., A. D. G. BAXTER-JONES, D. A. BAILEY, and G. P. BEUNEN. An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 689–694, 2002. Purpose The range of variability between individuals of the same chronological age (CA) in somatic and biological maturity is large and especially accentuated around the adolescent growth spurt. Maturity assessment is an important consideration when dealing with adolescents, from both a research perspective and youth sports stratification. A noninvasive, practical method predicting years from peak height velocity (a maturity offset value) by using anthropometric variables is developed in one sample and cross-validated in two different samples. Methods Gender specific multiple regression equations were calculated on a sample of 152 Canadian children aged 8–16 yr (79 boys; 73 girls) who were followed through adolescence from 1991 to 1997. The equations included three somatic dimensions (height, sitting height, and leg length), CA, and their interactions. The equations were cross-validated on a combined sample of Canadian (71 boys, 40 girls measured from 1964 through 1973) and Flemish children (50 boys, 48 girls measured from 1985 through 1999). Results The coefficient of determination (R2) for the boys’ model was 0.92 and for the girls’ model 0.91; the SEEs were 0.49 and 0.50, respectively. Mean difference between actual and predicted maturity offset for the verification samples was 0.24 (SD 0.65) yr in boys and 0.001 (SD 0.68) yr in girls. Conclusion: Although the cross-validation meets statistical standards for acceptance, caution is warranted with regard to implementation. It is recommended that maturity offset be considered as a categorical rather than a continuous assessment. Nevertheless, the equations presented are a reliable, noninvasive and a practical solution for the measure of biological maturity for matching adolescent athletes

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

La notice

Revue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Thématique
Sports Performance and Training
Domaine
Medicine
Établissements canadiens
Organismes subventionnaires
Mots-clés
AnthropometryDemographyMaturity (psychological)Growth spurtMathematicsPsychologyMedicineDevelopmental psychologyInternal medicine
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui