MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4241804319 · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0291

Anne Clifford

2015· reference-entry· en· W4241804319 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Megan Matchinske, Katharine Landers

Notice bibliographique

RevueRenaissance and Reformation · 2015
Typereference-entry
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBrotherPossession (linguistics)InjusticeCousinGenealogyHistoryWifeAncient historyClassicsLawPhilosophyArchaeologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lady Anne Clifford (b. 30 January 1590–d. 22 March 1676) spent a considerable portion of her life embroiled in lawsuits attempting to recover her father’s extensive land holdings after they had been transferred out of her hands and into the possession of his younger brother, Francis. With no living sons of his own, Clifford’s father had willed, wrongly it appears, the family properties to his titular heir apparent, the next earl in the Clifford line, and it would be a full thirty-eight years before Clifford would eventually regain her rights to her land, and only then because her male cousin Henry had died without male issue. During the whole of that process, Clifford wrote, recording not only her frustrations with the injustice of the actions against her but also of her observations more generally. These entries found their way into her Great Books of Record, meticulously kept genealogies of family history that she updated throughout her life. Deeply interested in historical recovery, not only of the retrieval of her namesake but also of her family’s place in the wider arena of England’s past, Clifford actively supported antiquarian research; hired men to comb England’s as-yet-unsifted archives; and worked assiduously herself to recover whatever she could of those earlier ancestors, recording dates, times, and events in an attempt to verify and authenticate her ancestral heritage. An early benefactor and patron, she held an abiding interest in the lands of her forebears and was a local advocate for the tenant farmers who worked her estates. She was a builder of almshouses, a restorer of castles, a commissioner of portraits, and a developer of public works. To this day she is still very much revered in her native Cumbria with something approximating celebrity status. Married twice, first to Richard Sackville, third earl of Dorset, and then to Philip Herbert, earl of Pembroke and Montgomery, Clifford struggled against, made use of, and eventually outlived both men in her bid to retain her rights to her lands, at one point even defying then King James I. She was also deeply close to her mother and would pass her legacy to her two daughters and their children. At the same time, she saw her patrimony as the most important testament she would leave to future generations. Accordingly it wasn’t finally or simply the titles she acquired by marriage that mattered, but rather those that she held in her own right, suo jure, as baroness and high sheriff, as daughter to a father who was, in turn, a son to a father before him that ultimately came to matter, and it was her willingness to fight for those titles and to insist that her daughters pass them forward eventually, hopefully, to sons who would ensure their longevity in a less tenuous or embattled state. Clifford is remembered across communities for her contributions to art, to architecture, to life writing, to antiquarianism, and to feminist scholarship. But it is Clifford’s penchant for personal recordkeeping that most directly cuts across these many and varied communities, bearing witness as well to another phenomenon of the Early Modern period, the construction of a written and introspective self. Lady Anne, fourteenth Baroness Clifford and hereditary high sheriff of Westmoreland, explores what it meant to be an Englishwoman of great standing, and she did so with wit, self-reflection, and candor.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,091
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,483

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,199 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRenaissance and ReformationMême sujetHistorical Art and Culture StudiesTravaux en français237 207