MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4241860000 · doi:10.1353/dss.2012.0062

Free Education

2012· article· en· W4241860000 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Natasha Lewis

Notice bibliographique

RevueDissent · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDiverse Education Studies and Reforms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDebtNewspaperSociologyMedia studiesEconomic historyManagementLawPolitical scienceHistoryEconomicsFinance

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Free Education Natasha Lewis U.S. universities thought their students understood the deal. They would raise tuition fees, and customers (students) would gamely take out ever-increasing loans to pay for them. Protest about the price of education was reserved for those countries still clinging to a naïve social democratic tradition. Mass student movements and 100-day education strikes might even be expected in Quebec or Chile, but not here. Perhaps it was the 50 percent leaving college to become unemployed or underemployed, perhaps it was the 25 percent of debtors in loan repayment delinquency, perhaps it was the 99 percent at Occupy. Either way, beginning in the fall, students from California to Ohio to Colorado to New York started shouting. On 1T Day this past spring—a day of action organized by the Occupy Student Debt Campaign to mark the moment when national student debt surpassed one trillion dollars— students from Cooper Union, New York City’s highly competitive art, architecture, and engineering college, congregated in front of their iconic brownstone Foundation Building, where Abraham Lincoln once spoke. None of those gathered had any student debt from Cooper Union, because, like every other person admitted to the prestigious design college for the past 110 years, they had all received full scholarships. But the day before 1T Day, the New York Times reported this was set to change: Cooper Union would begin charging tuition to graduate students. Students and faculty found out about the decision in the newspaper. The private college was founded by Peter Cooper, a self-made millionaire and philanthropist, in 1859, to further his belief that education should be as “free as air and water.” Working-class students, paid no tuition fees. Warren Buffett, eat your heart out. Since the first rumors of tuition started in the fall, students have campaigned to keep education at Cooper free, even though this value has never existed, even as a memory, for most students in the United States. On 1T Day, a huge likeness of the head and shoulders of CU’s board of trustees chair, Mark Epstein, bobbed above the gathered group. Using the artistic talents that got them into the college, students had created an outsized papier-mâché bust that bore an uncanny resemblance to the chair, complete with stern downturned mouth and green dollars seeping out of his nose. Chalk scrawls on the sidewalk slabs urged “KEEP COOPER UNION FREE” and advertised the fighting groups’ websites (friendsofcooperunion. org and freecooperunion.com). In December 2010, I’d seen similar chalkings on the outside walls of a University College London building occupied by students protesting the proposed trebling of fees to £9,000 a year (just under $15,000). Twelve hours after I visited the occupation, the increase was passed in Parliament. Outside, fires burning in Parliament Square lit the faces of angry students. Unlike U.S. students, the British ones didn’t need to look in history books to feel the sting of the decision; they were alive in 1998 when the first fees were introduced and knew of each hike. The politicians making the decisions had been educated for free at the cost of the state they now ran. Although some universities and colleges in the United States once offered free education, they preceded their British counterparts in jettisoning it. A handful exist. The tradition of free education at Cooper Union came from the generosity of a wealthy benefactor who is long dead, and debates about fees are limited to disagreements about where to invest or where to make savings. Cooper Union held on as an anomaly in the United States, a reminder that free higher education, a concept often presented in this country as a foreign ideal, is desirable here, too. [End Page 104] Copyright © 2012 Foundation for the Study of Independent Social Ideas, Inc

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,702
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,425

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0070,004
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,7020,494

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,364
Écart entre enseignants0,338 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDissentMême sujetDiverse Education Studies and ReformsTravaux en français237 207