MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4242045112 · doi:10.1353/sew.2013.0021

Bomber Boy

2013· article· en· W4242045112 sur OpenAlex
Scott Donaldson

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œSewanee review · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOfficerGirlLawMedia studiesHistoryManagementArt historyArtSociologyPsychologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Bomber Boy Scott Donaldson (bio) On November 21, 1940, more than a year before the attack on Pearl Harbor, Charlie Fenton presented himself to the Royal Canadian Air Force in Montreal as a candidate for pilot training. The next day Arnold Whitridge, the master of Calhoun College at Yale, wrote a damning letter to the commanding officer at the recruiting center. Fenton, then twenty-one, was “an intelligent boy,” Whitridge acknowledged, and quite able to keep up with the academic work at Yale, but had “preferred to amuse himself” instead. He described Fenton as “extremely unstable” and concluded with a devastating sentence the Canadian authorities highlighted: “It is possible, of course, that he will make a good officer, but I should not myself like to see him in any position of responsibility.” Whitridge had good reason to criticize Fenton, who was a classic case of misspent youth. As a second-semester freshman, he’d been dismissed from Yale in the spring of 1938 for entertaining a girl in his room. On this occasion, as Charlie told the story, the campus police caught him and the girl in flagrante delicto and commanded him to “pull out, and get out.” Readmitted fifteen months later, he was nearly expelled a second time for violating the solemnity of Yale’s Tap Day. Each spring aspiring juniors assembled in the Branford College courtyard, where an exclusive ninety of them would be tapped for membership in Yale’s secret societies: fifteen for each of six such societies, of which the most famous was—and is—Skull and Bones. Fenton, who regarded the ceremonial trappings of Bones with scorn, wandered about the courtyard randomly tapping candidates on the shoulder. “Go to your room,” he muttered, following the ritual, “Skull and Bones.” As many as twenty young men were temporarily uplifted—and subsequently disappointed—in this way. Members of Skull and Bones, learning of Fenton’s treachery, protested furiously to the college administration, and he was under scrutiny from then on. [End Page 78] The Tap Day episode occurred in May 1940. Fenton returned to Yale in the fall, veering between New Haven and New York in a haze of alcohol and sex. Then he left precipitously, without formally withdrawing from college, to enlist in the rcaf. He had worn out his welcome at Yale, and he did not want to miss the war. Despite the warning from Whitridge, the rcaf admitted Fenton and shipped him off for nine months to a year of pilot training. This was what he’d joined up for, and he was “very very happy.” For a few months he performed admirably. He passed his Initial Training School classes, and was sent to Elementary Flying School for more instruction and seventy hours in the air. He had “certainly picked the most harrowing way of saving democracy,” he wrote home—“one pitfall after another.” About one-third of the men flunked out; and, even if he passed, there would be another school to follow. For a time he was “frankly terrified,” but eventually he felt he’d “got the damned machine beaten” and started to enjoy flying. Before long, he told his parents in May 1941, he hoped to ship across the Atlantic as a fighter pilot. Soon thereafter—and not at all uncharacteristically—Charlie Fenton screwed up. Letting his fierce disdain for entitlements prevail, he went up on a routine training flight and ostentatiously buzzed the pool at the officers’ club—or so he later maintained. The rcaf records state that he washed out “because of misconduct”: going awol for three days—the first of five such actions on his service record. That breach of discipline cost him his pilot’s wings and his commission. Next he was sent to Air Observer School to be trained as a navigator. He failed that course too, probably because of minimal mathematical skills. In the aftermath, Charlie again went absent without leave for two days in late October. He would not be confined by rules and regulations, and he paid the penalties. The rcaf shipped him to gunnery school: “a nightmare, as the average lifetime of a gunner in action is 2½ minutes.” Six months...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,243
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,991

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,011

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,259
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle