MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4242382859 · doi:10.5342/michhistrevi.38.2.0134

Review

2012· article· en· W4242382859 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David N. Lucsko

Notice bibliographique

RevueMichigan Historical Review · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueAmerican History and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsState (computer science)LawAppealMonopolySociologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceEconomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

134 The Michigan Historical Review the Klan’s circle and linked the Klan’s social and cultural fascination to its political appeal. Left without enough examination are key issues such as Prohibition enforcement and a state anti-Catholic school bill, as well as other state and national political concerns. Nonetheless, by focusing primarily on the social and cultural dimensions of the Klan movement, Fox offers readers a fascinating, deeply researched, and original work, one of the very best community studies yet produced about the 1920’s Klan. Leonard J. Moore McGill University William Greenleaf. Monopoly on Wheels: Henry Ford and the Selden Automobile Patent. 1961; repr., Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2011. Pp. 302. Bibliography. Index. Notes. Paper, $24.95. In 1879, patent attorney and tinkerer George B. Selden applied for a U.S. patent for an “improved road engine,” a broad claim covering the use of a gasoline internal-combustion engine in a road-going vehicle. Selden then exploited legal loopholes to delay his patent’s issue until 1895, when gasoline-powered cars were starting to catch on. Selden never built a car. The vehicle described in his patent bore little resemblance to those built in 1895. And, most critically, the gasoline cars made in 1895 were developed independently; their creators neither knew of nor benefited from Selden’s plans. Nevertheless, his broadly conceived patent meant that anyone producing a gasolinepowered car owed Selden royalties—beginning in 1895 and for many years thereafter until the patent was struck down in court. The fledgling automobile industry was shaken to its core. Selden teamed with an East Coast conglomerate called the Electric Vehicle Company (derisively known as the “lead cab trust”), which began to target patent-infringing firms. Many companies “in the crosshairs” decided to give in rather than face costly lawsuits, and out of their acquiescence a patent pool was formed in 1903, the Association of Licensed Automobile Manufacturers (ALAM). Like other pools, the ALAM limited entry to licensed firms. It also brought suit against unlicensed companies—those that refused to accept the legitimacy of the Selden patent and pay tribute, or those that sought but were denied entry into ALAM. These “independents” typically shared a more radical vision of the automotive future, one of mass-produced everyman’s cars Book Reviews 135 rather than the high-cost, low-volume machines that dominated ALAM members’ lineups. Among the independents, one in particular stood out: Henry Ford. Sued for patent-infringement in 1903, Ford fought back. A protracted battle ensued, which was not resolved until 1911, when on appeal ALAM’s claims were dismissed and the Selden patent rendered virtually worthless. The East Coast trust was smashed, and firms like Ford were free at last to churn out simple, cheap, and honest cars for the masses. This is a well-known tale. Anyone familiar with the history of the automobile will have heard it time and again. Why is this so? Because of William Greenleaf’s Monopoly on Wheels: Henry Ford and the Selden Automobile Patent, which was first published in 1961. Based on exhaustive research into the Selden case, this masterful book is a modern classic, a page-turner that reads more like a novel than what it is: a discourse on the minutiae of patent and technological history. Long out of print, Greenleaf’s book has become prohibitively expensive. Few have ever seen an original copy, let alone owned one or contemplated assigning it to students. Indeed, our collective familiarity with its story is largely due to subsequent summaries written by others. Fortunately, Wayne State University Press has now stepped in and reissued Greenleaf’s book as an inexpensive paperback (it has done the same for other unobtainable works, including Charles Sorensen’s My Forty Years with Ford). Accessible, intelligent, and rich in detail—if occasionally unabashed in its praise for Mr. Ford—Monopoly on Wheels remains the definitive text on the Selden suit. Only now, you won’t have to eat instant noodles for a year to afford a copy. David N. Lucsko Auburn University Adam Jortner. The Gods of Prophetstown: The Battle of Tippecanoe and the Holy War for the American Frontier. New York: Oxford University Press...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,364
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMichigan Historical ReviewMême sujetAmerican History and CultureTravaux en français237 207