"Always in the Likeness": The Virtual Presences of Helmut Kajzaris Gw'azda in the Lothe Lachmann Theatre
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
“Always in the Likeness”:The Virtual Presences of Helmut Kajzar’s Gwiazda in the Lothe Lachmann Theatre Katarzyna Kwapisz (bio) In the 1970s, Helmut Kajzar formulated his manifesto, in which he defined theatre as "a place in between – such as stairs, a hallway, such as the Earth" (Manifest); yet, he never stopped asking where theatre begins and where it ends (Teatr Meta-codzienny).1 Nearly thirty years later, the participants of the International Theatre Festival, Dialog, were trying to answer, "What can the theatre offer […] in the time of the expeditious development of audiovisual arts? Does the theatre try to compete with the tools of contemporary pop-culture […] how does it use them?" ("Dialog"). After he had written his manifesto for Teatr Metacodzienno_ci [the Theatre of Meta-everydayness], Kajzar bought one of the first tape recorders available in Poland and, delighted with the new opportunities, treated it as an element of his theatre. Over the years, technological inventions have become not only tools or instruments in theatre but the meaningful elements of the theatrical space; similarly, digital transmission not only has enabled theatre to stage events, now, using solutions familiar from television or film but also poses basic questions as to the status of materiality and presence in theatre. Trying not to compete with the tools of contemporary electronic culture but rather to use them, theatre has developed various hybrids, extending the range of its already multiform configurations with multimedia performance. Equipped with technology much more advanced than Kajzar's tape recorder and questing after the body as "the primary means of theatrical display" (Kunst, "Impossible"), the Videoteatr "Poza" [Lothe Lachmann Theatre] actively pursues one of the lines of inquiry into this marriage of diverse forms. Theatre is the area of human artistic activity that combines the real and the virtual, the material and the immaterial, the non-physical and the corporeal modalities in a temporal and spatial appropriation of meaning. Various stage experiments have, in one way or another, attempted to use technology to reexamine these correlations. In the network of wires, cameras, projectors, and [End Page 513] screens, the most obvious and approachable tool for artistic creation – the body – has faced the danger of becoming redundant, or at least insufficient as the essential instrument of the theatrical medium. Thus, media, accused of creating surrogates for the reality that aspires to be conceived as the "only" reality, have been regarded as a threat to so-called real art. Challenged with such an accusation, diverse modes of multimedia performance, usually flourishing outside the structures of the theatre, have taken the concept of the body as the most "representative" sign of their alternative form of expression, raising awareness of what N. Katherine Hayles describes as a "technological development [that] can no longer be meaningfully separated from the human subject" (xiii). As an umbrella term, "multimedia performance" includes various practices that explore and extend performance through the combined use of animated projections, virtual images, and computer networks, which operate within the performance. In such computer-driven artistic ventures, the physical body struggles to mark its presence using zeros and ones. As a projected, simulated, or in some other way actuated "image," the body intricately combines the opposing rules of physicality and immateriality, of the actual and the virtual, reality and fiction. At the same time, it seems to evince the climactic point of the changing relations among text, representation, stage, actors, and audience in the modern theatre. Not without reason, Lachmann's play with electronic media, with embodied subject and mechanized object, can be understood as an attempt to unravel "the mystery of the real artificiality" (B»o½ski 9), to find out what an electronic mask or prosthesis, and this unnatural "pose" of the body, may stand for in theatre. Piotr Lachmann, a poet, essayist and translator, enacts these concepts in the theatre he has been producing with the actress Jolanta Lothe since 1985.2 Their Videoteatr "Poza," called by Marian GrzeÑczak the LLT (Lothe Lachmann Theatre), provocatively combines live acting with visual and audio recordings, producing, as some would say, inorganic surrogates of the human body. The LLT creates a theatrical space overloaded with technological equipment, in...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».