MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4242700096 · doi:10.22374/cjgim.v9i4.8

Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: Rare or Underdiagnosed?

2014· article· en· W4242700096 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Selena Au, Ali Rezaie

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiquePorphyrin Metabolism and Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAbdominal painNauseaVomitingPast medical historyEmergency departmentDiarrheaMedical historyEpigastric painPediatricsInternal medicinePsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A 38-year-old male presented to the emergency department with severe acute-on-chronic abdominal pain. For the previous 20 years, he had experienced daily sharp epigastric pain with generalization to the entire abdomen. The pain typically began late in the morning and could last from hours to days. It was associated with nausea, vomiting, diaphoresis, and occasionally fever, diarrhea, and fatty or bloody bowel movements. These symptoms were not associated with food consumption. Over the previous five years, the patient had lost over 20 kg in weight and had noticed a marked decline in his performance at work and in the quality of his leisure time. He found symptom relief by smoking rolled marijuana cigarettes (“joints”), which he had been using three times per day since his teens. His pain crises were alleviated only with soaking in a tub of “scalding hot” bath water which he drew up ritualistically every morning. The patient’s symptoms had previously been investigated by his family physician, who suspected acute intermittent porphyria (AIP), but it is unclear what medical diagnostics had been performed. Quetiapine (50 mg qhs) had been prescribed and started one year prior to presentation, but during a review of systems, the patient denied having had any psychiatric symptoms. His medical history was significant only for smoking and lactose intolerance. Review of systems and family history were negative for autoimmune, infectious, malignant, or inflammatory bowel disease. When questioned as to why he chose to come to the emergency department just then, the patient replied that his family physician had suggested that he present during one of the more severe pain crises in order to allow laboratory work-up to confirm the diagnosis of AIP. At the time of presentation, the patient had been ill for the previous four days. On examination, the patient was febrile (38.6 o C), hypertensive (195/113), and markedly dehydrated. He was of thin habitus and had normal results on cardiorespiratory examination. His abdomen was nondistended but diffusely tender. Abdominal rigidity with guarding was noted by the emergency physician but was absent on reassessment by internal medicine. The patient’s laboratory investigation results were consistent with a stress response and dehydration, including hemoglobin = 193 g/L, white blood cell count = 20 × 109 g/L, creatinine = 164 µmol/L, and lactate = 2.7 mmol/L. Liver enzymes and the results of tests of hepatic synthesis were normal. Urine porphobilinogen at the time of crisis was negative for AIP. Upon a review of the literature, a diagnosis of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome was made. To rule out other organic etiologies, the patient underwent abdominal computed tomography, which was unremarkable. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with gastric biopsies revealed no pathology.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,079
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,243
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of General Internal MedicineMême sujetPorphyrin Metabolism and DisordersTravaux en français237 207