Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Once again, in this its second issue, the SFU Educational Review offers a further forum for the various ideas generated at the annual Education With/Out Borders (EWOB) conference.Fiona McKeller's somewhat iconic image on the cover illustrates the dual nature of borders in both providing reasonable and directive boundaries and, by their very nature, the possibilities of breaching or bending those boundaries.Relatedly, her fascinating video of Education With/Out Borders and its genesis provides a fascinating retrospective on the evolution of EWOB, and it is interesting to see the various perspectives taken on the concept of borders, on the conference itself, and, in a larger sense, how these might define or at least question notions of scholarship and scholarly activity: a necessarily perennial and evolving consideration.This issue of the journal sees six worthy contributions whose themes overlap, covering narrative, complexity, sites of learning, and, yes, borders.Susan Barber explores the ways in which teachers' own stories can help them develop their senses of themselves as teachers; she proposes a new genre: pedagogical literature.She goes on to write: "If students who are becoming teachers can access a variety of stories about how identity is changing as they are in the process of becoming teachers, as well as learning about how they might handle situations they have not yet come across, they might be able to translate some of this knowledge into real life."Further, Barber takes a holistic approach to the roles and identities of teachers, seeing them develop in and through the relationships in the classroom and surrounding social spheres.She offers a practical end: "If students who are becoming teachers can access a variety of stories about how identity is changing as they are in the process of becoming teachers, as well as learning about how they might handle situations they have not yet come across, they might be able to translate some of this knowledge into real life."The intersections of literature, identity, and pedagogy which, interacting together, shift the borders of each.This is exactly the theme that Craig Newell works with in his paper on the applications of complexity theory to education.He asks us to consider a synergistic shift from the student to the collective class and its interactions as the systemic locus of learning.Further, in exploring the work of Brent Davies, Dennis Sumara, and Elaine Simmt, he suggests this system may be adaptive: we no longer consider individual learners but a self-organizing, collective learning system.Citing Davies and Summara, Newell notes that complexity cannot be scripted into the classroom but it can be occasioned.Just such an occasioning occurred with the publication of his paper.He had included an image of sandpipers taking off as a flock from a beach to illustrate the principle of emergence, and had found the image on the website of a Bed-and-Breakfast in New Brunswick.(One of the reviewers of Newell's paper had commented: "A beautiful and excellent choice of image to show concepts of selforganization in complex systems.")The owners of the website gave their consent to use of the image in what might represent a charming first: likely the first time the owners of a Bed-and-Breakfast have ever had their intellectual property acknowledged in an academic journal.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,190 | 0,127 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».