Chief Editor Introduction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Currently, there are no well-studied models of how to incorporate Islamic religious coping strategies into the clinical encounter.Adam and Ward's study, "Stress, Religious Coping, and Wellbeing in Acculturating Muslims", provides therapists and researchers further consideration of the role of Islam in counseling Muslims.In spite of the positive association between religious coping and higher life satisfaction, there was no association between religious coping and psychological symptoms.This negative finding is important for researchers who are interested in incorporating Islamic coping practices in counseling to consider and build upon; when appropriate, the Journal of Muslim Mental Health publishes negative studies to prevent publication bias that favors the role of spirituality in emotional health.However, the negative finding may be due to the relatively healthy sample of participants of the study as well as the tight range of psychological wellbeing scores.Furthermore, the study is crosssectional and was not designed to test interventions that integrate religious coping to improve psychological symptom scores.Clinicians may find psychometric scales, and/or the constructs of the scales, such as the Muslim Religious Coping scale useful to better understand how their clients cope with stressful life events.Sexual health in Muslim communities is another topic that is grossly understudied.Ali-Faisal, in her study "What's Sex Got to Do with It?The Role of Sexual Experience in the Sexual Attitudes, and Sexual Guilt and Anxiety of Young Muslim Adults in Canada and the United States", offers an important contribution to the field.She demonstrates that Muslim adults who reported having premarital sex were less likely to report feeling anxiety and guilt about sex.Although the majority (79%) of her 403 participants are female, she was able recruit an ethnically diverse group of participants.Approximately the same percentage of her sample of Muslim men and women reported having sex before marriage (37.8% of women and 31.7% of men surveyed), which is significantly lower than proportions reported among other North Americans.Ali-Faisal concludes that participants who engaged in premarital sex held more liberal views about sex and had less sexual guilt and anxiety.Unfortunately, religiosity and acculturation was not measured in this group and the role of religion, traditional values, and acculturation on sexual attitudes would be purely
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».