Notice bibliographique
Résumé
No AccessPerspectives on Hearing and Hearing Disorders in ChildhoodArticle1 Apr 2004Biological Basis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin ASHA, Speech-Language-Hearing and ResearchRockville, MD Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/hhdc14.1.4 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Ahmad, M., Bohne, B. A., & Harding, G. W. (2003). An in vivo tracer study of noise-induced damage to the reticular lamina.Hearing Research, 175, 82–100. Google Scholar ASHA. Retrieved August 11, 2003, from http://www.asha.org/public/ hearing/disorders/noise.htm Google Scholar Brownell, W. E. (1990). Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions.Ear and Hearing, 11, 82–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Caiazzo, A. J., & Tonndorf, J. (1978). Ear canal resonance and temporary threshold shift.Otolaryngology, 86, ORL-820. Google Scholar Candreia, C.,Martin, G. K., & Lonsbury-Martin, B. L. (2002). Wild-derived MOLF/EI inbred mice with normal distortion product otoacoustic emissions show exceptional resistance to noise exposure.Association for Research in Otolaryngology Abstracts, 25, 169. Google Scholar Canlon, B.,Borg, E., & Flock, A. (1988). Protection against noise trauma by preexposure to a low level acoustic stimulus.Hearing Research, 34, 197–200. Google Scholar Canlon, B.,Agerman, K.,Dauman, R., & Puel, J. L. (1998). Pharmacological strategies for preventing cochlear damage induced by noise trauma.Noise & Health, 1, 13–23. Google Scholar Clark, J. A., & Pickles, J. O. (1996). The effects of moderate and low levels of acoustic overstimulation on stereocilia and their tip links in the guinea pig.Hearing Research, 99, 119–128. Google Scholar Collet, L.,Kemp, D. T.,Veuillet, E.,Duclaux, R., Moulin, A., & Morgon, A. (1990). Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects.Hearing Research, 43, 251–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Cotanche, D. A. (1987). Regeneration of hair cell stereociliary bundles in the chick cochlea following severe acoustic trauma.Hearing Research, 30, 181–196. Google Scholar Cotanche, D. A.,Lee, K. H.,Stone, J. S., & Picard, D. A. (1994). Hair cell regeneration in the bird cochlea following noise damage or ototoxic drug damage.Anatomical Embryology, 189, 1–18. Google Scholar Cruz, R. M.,Lambert, P. R., & Rubel, E. W. (1987). Light microscopic evidence of hair cell regeneration after gentamicin toxicity in chick cochlea.Archives of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, 13, 1058–1062. Google Scholar Desai, A.,Reed, D.,Cheyne, A.,Richards, S., & Prasher, D. (1999). Absence of otoacoustic emissions in subjects with normal audiometric thresholds implies exposure to noise.Noise & Health, 1, 5865. Google Scholar Erway, L. C.,Shiau, Y. W.,Davis, R. R., & Krieg, E. F. (1996). Genetics of age-related hearing loss in mice. III. Susceptibility of inbred and F1 hybrid strains to noise-induced hearing loss.Hearing Research, 93, 181–187. Google Scholar Jimenez, A. M.,Stagner, B. B.,Martin, G. K., & Lonsbury-Martin, B. L. (2001). Susceptibility of DPOAEs to sound overexposure in inbred mice with AHL.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2, 233–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Johnsson, L.G., & Hawkins, J. E. (1976). Degeneration patterns in human ears exposed to noise. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 85, 725–739. Google Scholar Kawamoto, K.,Ishimoto, S.,Minoda, R.,Brough, D. E., & Raphael, Y. (2003). Math1 gene transfer generates new cochlear hair cells in mature guinea pigs in vivo.Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 4395–4400. Google Scholar Kim, D. O.,Dorn, P. A.,Neely, S. T., & Gorga, M. P. (2001). Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in human.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2, 31–40. Google Scholar Kopke, R. D.,Coleman, J. K.,Liu, J.,Campbell, K. C., & Riffenburgh, R. H. (2002). Candidate’s thesis: enhancing intrinsic cochlear stress defenses to reduce noise-induced hearing loss.Laryngoscope, 112, 1515–1532. Google Scholar Maison, S.F., & Liberman, M.C. (2000). Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength.Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 4701–4707. CrossrefGoogle Scholar McFadden, E. A., & Saunders, J. C. (1989). Recovery of auditory function following intense sound exposure in the neonatal chick.Hearing Research, 41, 205–215. Google Scholar McGill, T. J. I., & Schuknecht, H. F. (1976). Human cochlear changes in noise-induced hearing loss.Laryngoscope, 86, 1293–1302. Google Scholar Miyakita, T.,Hellstrom, P. A., Frimanson, E., & Axelsson, A. (1992). Effect of low level acoustic stimulation on temporary threshold shift in young humans.Hearing Research, 60, 149–155. Google Scholar Morest, D. K., & Bohne, B. A. (1983). Noise-induced degeneration in the brain and representation of inner and outer hair cells.Hearing Research, 9, 145–151. Google Scholar Nordmann, A. S.,Bohne, B. A., & Harding, G. W. (2000). Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift.Hearing Research, 139, 13–30. Google Scholar Ou, H. C.,Harding, G. W., & Bohne, B. A. (2000). An anatomically based frequency-place map for the mouse cochlea.Hearing Research, 145, 123–129. Google Scholar Schneider, M. E.,Belyantseva, I. A.,Azevedo, R. B., & Kachar, B. (2002). Rapid renewal of auditory hair bundles.Nature, 418, 837–838. Google Scholar Tucci, D. L., & Rubel, E. W. (1990). Physiologic status of regenerated hair cells in the avian inner ear following aminoglycoside ototoxicity.Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, 103, 443–450. Google Scholar Zheng, J. L., & Gao, W. Q. (2000). Overexpression of Math1 induces robust production of extra hair cells in postnatal rat inner ears.Nature Neuroscience, 3, 580–586. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 14Issue 1April 2004Pages: 4-9 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Apr 1, 2004 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesleader-topicsCopyright & Permissions© 2004 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».