MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4243372233 · doi:10.2523/86787-ms

Corporate Social Responsibility - Capturing the Value

2004· article· en· W4243372233 sur OpenAlex
Cindy Overton

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueOil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesSuncor Energy Incorporated
Mots-clésCitationCorporate social responsibilitySustainabilityBusinessSocial mediaValue (mathematics)Public relationsComputer scienceLibrary sciencePolitical scienceWorld Wide Web

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Corporate Social Responsibility - Capturing the Value Cindy Overton Cindy Overton Convergence Advisors Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. Paper Number: SPE-86787-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/86787-MS Published: March 29 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Overton, Cindy. "Corporate Social Responsibility - Capturing the Value." Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/86787-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Environment, and Sustainability Search Advanced Search AbstractThis paper will provide an update on current Corporate Social Responsibility practices among energy companies, discuss internal and external drivers and underscore how these initiatives bring value to the bottom line. Experiences of Suncor Energy and Talisman Energy are presented to demonstrate the different challenges companies encounter and to share their lessons learned.IntroductionThe practice of Corporate Social Responsibility is evolving and becoming more sophisticated as the effort in the companies with the most advanced programs becomes embedded in operating philosophies. The benefits derived from a robust Corporate Social Responsibility program are driven to the bottom line, but without a strategic focus, these benefits cannot be fully captured.Where We AreTo level the playing field, we need a definitional understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. The reason I begin here is that the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility is still not well understood, and confusion remains for many not intimately involved with it. Because it is a voluntary activity, it has not been uniformly embraced. There is no global definition and companies are using the terminology that best describes their internal vision and the message they choose to deliver. There is no single driver that has propelled companies to initiate a program, nor is there a specific set of circumstances that compel a company to act.Corporate Social Responsibility efforts are referred to as Corporate Responsibility, Social Responsibility, Corporate Citizenship, Sustainability, or Sustainable Development. Generally, we are talking about managing all environmental, social and economic aspects of the business while maintaining a business focus. Throughout this discussion, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development will be used interchangeably. This is a reflection of how our industry (generally) is also using the term.A few representative definitions used in the industry:"Sustainable Development is about our commitment to conduct our business to promote economic growth, a healthy environment and vibrant communities, now and into the future. For our company, Sustainable Development provides a strong, pragmatic business model for addressing the needs and demands of society - advancing the growth of our company while improving living standards and enhancing environmental and social conditions."1"For our business this [sustainable development] is about engaging with our stakeholders to better understand and manage the impacts, both positive and negative, that our operations and products have on society and the environment today, and to identify business opportunities for the future."2"Meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."3"...the best way to fulfill our commitment of good corporate citizenship is to build responsible practices into the fabric of our operations...through clearly defined standards of conduct, industry-leading policies and practices and ...management systems..."4"Managing our environmental and social impacts and improving performance."5"A coherent CSR strategy, based on integrity, sound values and a long-term approach can offer clear business benefits. These cover a better alignment of corporate goals with those of society; maintaining the company's reputation; securing its continued license to operate; and reducing its exposure to liabilities, risks and associated costs."6 Keywords: social responsibility, sustainable development, social responsibility and development, transparency, reporting, corporate social responsibility, bottom line, suncor, stakeholder, spe 86787 Subjects: Sustainability/Social Responsibility, Social responsibility and development This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,829
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,459

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,066
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,208 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle