Rotator Cuff Repair in Adolescent Athletes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objectives: Rotator cuff tears are rare injuries in adolescents, but can be a cause of significant morbidity if unrecognized. Previous literature on rotator cuff repairs in adolescents is limited to small case series, with little data to guide treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical information, demographics, and results of surgical treatment of a consecutive series of adolescent athletes who underwent rotator cuff repair with a minimum 2-year follow-up. We hypothesized that adolescent patients would have excellent functional outcome scores and return to the same level of sports participation after rotator cuff repair, but would have some difficulty returning to the same position in overhead sports. Methods: A retrospective search of the practice’s billing records identified all patients with high-grade (>50%) partial-thickness or rotator cuff tears that underwent rotator cuff repair between 2006 and 2014 with an age of less than 18 years at the time of surgery and a minimum of two years of follow-up. Clinical records were evaluated for demographic information, and telephone follow-up was obtained for return to play, performance, other surgeries and complications, a numeric pain rating scale (0-10) for current shoulder pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Assessment Form, and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC). Statistical analysis was performed with JMP 10 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) with p < 0.05 for significance. Descriptive statistics were prepared for all variables, and outcomes were compared according to affected tendon and concomitant procedures using two-sided Fisher’s exact tests and Student’s t-tests. Results: Thirty-two consecutive adolescent athletes (28 boys and 4 girls) with a mean age of 16.1 years (range 13.2-17.9 years, SD=1.3) met inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine patients (91%) had a traumatic event associated with the onset of their shoulder pain, and 27 of these patients (93%) had no symptoms prior to the trauma. The most common tendon affected was the supraspinatus (21 patients, 66%). All seven subscapularis injuries were repaired in open fashion, while all other tears were repaired arthroscopically with either a single-row or double-row configuration depending on tear size and anatomy. Of the 18 partial-thickness tears, eight (44%) were measured intraoperatively to be 50-75% of the footprint, and the remaining ten tears (56%) encompassed greater than 75% of the footprint from medial to lateral. Twenty-seven patients (84%) d the outcome questionnaires at a mean of 6.2 years after surgery (range 2-10 years, SD=2.6 years). The mean ASES score was 93 (range 65-100, SD=9), mean WORC was 89% (range 60%-100%, SD=13%), and mean numeric pain rating was 0.3 (range 0-3, SD=0.8). Table 1 Overall, 25 patients (93%) were able to return to the same level of play or higher. In overhead athletes, 13 patients (93%) were able to return to the same level of play, but 8 patients (57%) were forced to switch positions due to difficulty with throwing. There were no surgical complications, but two patients did undergo a second operation during the study period. Conclusion: Surgical repair of high-grade partial-thickness and rotator cuff tears yielded successful outcomes in adolescents, with excellent functional outcomes at mid-term follow-up. However, overhead athletes may have difficulty playing the same position after surgery due to difficulty throwing. [Table: see text]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».