MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4243635555 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004868.pub2

Late erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants

2006· reference-entry· en· W4243635555 sur OpenAlexaff
Sanjay M Aher, Arne Ohlsson

Notice bibliographique

RevueCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2006
Typereference-entry
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineLow birth weightCochrane LibraryAnemiaErythropoietinPediatricsRandomized controlled trialPlaceboBirth weightBlood transfusionObstetricsPregnancyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hematocrit falls after birth in preterm infants due to physiological factors and blood letting. Low plasma levels of erythropoietin (EPO) in preterm infants provide a rationale for the use of EPO to prevent or treat anemia. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of late initiation of EPO (initiated at 8 days after birth or later) in reducing the use of red blood cell transfusions in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: Subgroup analyses of low (< 500 IU/kg/week) and high (> 500 IU/kg/week) doses of EPO and within these subgroups analyses of the use of low (< 5 mg/kg/day) and high (> 5 mg/kg/day) doses of supplemental iron, in reducing the use of red blood cell transfusions in these infants. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, abstracts from scientific meetings published in Pediatric Research and reference lists of identified trials and reviews were searched in November 2005/April 2006 and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2006). No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomized controlled trials of late initiation of EPO treatment (started at eight days of age or later) vs. placebo or no intervention in preterm (< 37 weeks) and/or low birth weight (< 2500 g) neonates. For inclusion the studies needed to provide information on at least one outcome of interest. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were abstracted by the two authors on pre-tested data collection forms. Data were entered by one review author (AO) and checked for accuracy by the other (SA). Data were analysed using RevMan 4.2.8. The statistical methods included relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB), number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes reported with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). A fixed effects model was used for meta-analyses. Heterogeneity tests including the I squared (I(2)) statistic were performed to assess the appropriateness of pooling the data. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies enrolling 1302 preterm infants in 21 countries were included. The quality of the trials varied. Most trials were of small sample size. Only one study clearly stated that infants were excluded if they had received red blood cell transfusion prior to study entry (Samanci 1996). A total of 19 studies including 912 infants reported on the primary outcome of "Use of one or more red cell transfusions". The meta-analysis showed a significant effect [typical RR; 0.66 (95% CI; 0.59, 0.74); typical RD -0.21 (95% CI; -0.26, -0.16); typical NNTB of 5 (95% CI 4, 6)]. There was statistically significant heterogeneity [for RR (p < 0.00001), I(2 )= 74.0% and for RD (p = 0.0006), I(2 )=58.9%]. Similar results were obtained in secondary analyses based on different combinations of high/low doses of EPO and iron supplementation. There was a significant reduction in the total volume (ml/kg) of blood transfused per infant (four studies enrolling 177 infants) [typical WMD = -7 ml (95% CI -12, -3)] and in the number of transfusions per infant (nine studies enrolling 567 infants); [typical WMD -0.78 (-0.97, -0.59)]. The effect size was less in a post hoc analyses of high quality studies compared to studies in which the quality was uncertain and in studies that used strict guidelines for red blood cell transfusions vs. studies that did not. There were no significant differences in mortality, retinopathy of prematurity, sepsis, intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, SIDS, neutropenia, hypertension, or length of hospital stay. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes were not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Late administration of EPO reduces the use of one or more red blood cell transfusions, the number of red blood cell transfusions per infant and the total volume of red blood cell transfused per infant. The clinical importance of the results for the latter two outcomes is marginal (< 1 transfusion per infant and 7 ml/kg of transfused red blood cells). Any donor exposure is likely not avoided as most studies included infants who had received red cell transfusions prior to trial entry. Late EPO does not significantly reduce or increase any of many important neonatal adverse outcomes including mortality and retinopathy of prematurity. Further research of the use of late EPO treatment to prevent donor exposure is not indicated. Research efforts should focus on limiting donor exposure during the first few days of life in sick neonates, when red blood cell requirements are most likely to be required and cannot be prevented by late EPO treatment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,046
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0090,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,310
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations61
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsTravaux en français237 207