The Efficacy of Premixed Nitrous Oxide and Oxygen for Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy in Pediatric Patients. A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Chest. 2004;125:315–21. Fauroux B, Onody P, Gall O, et al Comments: Many bronchoscopists prefer general anesthesia (GA) for performing flexible bronchoscopy in children. Although GA assures patient comfort, and better cough control during bronchoscopy, it is difficult to organize, increases cost of care, and places children at risks associated with anesthesia. Also, dynamic airway abnormalities, an important indication for pediatric bronchoscopy, cannot be evaluated in anesthetized children. As a result of these reasons, some centers prefer to perform bronchoscopy under conscious sedation and local anesthesia in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of premixed 50% nitrous oxide and oxygen in improving the quality of sedation and pain control during FB in children. The study included a total of 105 children undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic FB. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either premixed 50% nitrous oxide and oxygen or premixed 50% nitrogen and oxygen. Both the endoscopy team and the patients were blinded to the mixture inhaled. All patients received intrarectal atropine and benzodiazepines. Lidocaine was used for topical anesthesia. The authors used several methods to assess the efficacy of the analgesic agent. The primary outcome measure was the rate of failure of the first inhalation mixture to control pain. The other outcome measures were 1) quality of sedation and pain control assessed using Children's Hospital of East Ontario pain Score (CHEOPS), 2) the patient's self reported assessment, 3) global pain control assessment by the endoscopy team, 4) self-reported pain by children >6 years using a visual analog scale, and 5) assessment of independent blinded observers who reviewed the videotape of the procedure. The failure rate was significantly lower in the nitrogen oxide group compared with the control group (21% vs. 62%, P < 0.05). Other outcome measures also showed a clear advantage of nitrogen oxide and oxygen inhalation during bronchoscopy than the nitrogen and oxygen inhalation. The onset of analgesic effect of inhaled nitrous oxide was rapid and its effect was short-lasting after stopping the treatment. Side effects were minor and were similar in both groups. The adequacy of patient comfort and pain control is an important consideration when bronchoscopy is performed in children. A sizable proportion of adult patient has reported poor pain control during flexible bronchoscopy despite sedation, analgesics, and topical anesthesia (Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:440–5 ). Similar data are not available in pediatric patients, but there is a general perception that suboptimal pain control during operative procedures is an important problem in pediatric patients. Nitrous oxide therapy has been used for its analgesic properties in various invasive procedures. The therapy has an established safety record in pediatric patients (Lancet 2001;358:1514–5 ), and it is easy to administer. This well-designed study establishes better sedation and pain control with premixed 50% nitrous oxide and oxygen in children undergoing FB. The results will encourage pediatric pulmonologists to incorporate this simple measure to better control pain associated with bronchoscopy in children.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».