Ultradeep Extended-Reach Stimulations
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ultradeep Extended-Reach Stimulations Taylor Tongs; Taylor Tongs Andergauge Drilling Systems Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Angela Hinrichs; Angela Hinrichs Suncor Energy Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Rae Spickett; Rae Spickett Schlumberger Reservoir Evaluation & Development Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Les Robertson Les Robertson Andergauge Drilling Systems Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, U.S.A., March 2007. Paper Number: SPE-106874-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/106874-MS Published: March 20 2007 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Tongs, Taylor, Hinrichs, Angela, Spickett, Rae, and Les Robertson. "Ultradeep Extended-Reach Stimulations." Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, U.S.A., March 2007. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/106874-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search Abstract Recent advances in drilling technology have resulted in longer horizontal wells being drilled to more efficiently exploit reservoirs. However, these long open hole horizontals are often problematic when using coiled tubing as the well intervention conveyance system during stimulation.Coiled tubing, a commonly used intervention tool for open hole horizontals, is considerably less stiff than jointed drill pipe and cannot reach TD on many wells due to friction. Assistance from friction reducers, well tractors or other devices have helped, but can be potentially damaging, expensive and/or high risk.This poster details the use of a simple agitation tool placed in the coiled tubing bottom hole assembly during the stimulation. This results in decreased friction which in turn increases reach for coiled tubing thereby allowing full horizontal open hole stimulation treatment.The case study that is presented on the performance of the agitation tool used in coiled tubing stimulations in long horizontal open hole sections of a hot, sour reservoir with a total measured depth up to 7 kilometers.Suncor Energy has utilized this process in the development of its Panther River reservoirs in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin with excellent results. Benefits discussed include reduced completion cost and reduced environmental impact. Keywords: Directional Drilling, drilling operation, well completion, open hole, flow rate, agitation tool, Coiled tubing operations, friction, acid, Completion Installation and Operations Subjects: Drilling Operations, Directional drilling, Completion Installation and Operations, Coiled tubing operations Copyright 2007, Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».