Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABA MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION “Examination Dates and Qualification Deadlines: 2010” A physician’s ability to demonstrate his or her qualifications through continuous certification is gaining attention among the public, as well as regulatory, licensing, and accrediting organizations. The American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) recognizes the importance of such an initiative and has developed the Maintenance of Certification in Anesthesiology (MOCA) Program to help physicians demonstrate their commitment to quality clinical outcomes, and patient safety. MOCA offers certified anesthesiologists the opportunity to participate in personal improvement activities to improve their effectiveness, while advancing the standard of specialty medical care. An overview of the MOCA Program follows.MOCA is a four-part program that consists of the following requirements: Part I: periodic assessment of professional standing (medical licensure); Part II: continual participation in lifelong learning and self-assessment activities (continuing medical education); Part III: demonstration of cognitive expertise (via examination); and Part IV: participation in practice performance assessment and improvement activities.The ABA voluntary Anesthesiology Recertification Program is being phased out in 2009. The final application window is now closed, and the last recertification examination will be administered in December 2009. MOCA is now the only recertification option, and is available to all ABA diplomates, whether or not their initial certification is time-limited.Diplomates certified before 2000 hold a non–time limited (NTL) certificate. The ABA will not alter the status of NTL diplomates if they choose not to recertify or complete the MOCA program. However, the ABA strongly encourages NTL diplomates to participate in MOCA because the program promotes lifelong learning with an emphasis on improving the overall quality of care delivered to patients. Maintenance of certification moves beyond the ABA’s former recertification model to formally assess the diplomate’s continuous commitment to lifelong learning and professional development.ABA diplomates certified after 1999 have a time-limited certificate and must complete the 10-year MOCA program in order to maintain their diplomate status. The ABA automatically enrolls them in MOCA when they are awarded initial certification. They can view their MOCA progress report by accessing their portal account through the ABA website (www.theABA.org). The earliest they can qualify for examination is three years before their certification expires (i.e. , 2010 for diplomates with a certificate that expires in 2013).Different forms of the examination are administered annually in January and July or August, by computer, at test centers in the United States and Canada. MOCA and Recertification candidates take the same examination in 2009; only MOCA candidates can qualify for examination in 2010. The test dates and deadlines by which diplomates must qualify for examination during testing windows in 2010 are:
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,880 | 0,806 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».