MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4244219928 · doi:10.2523/65507-ms

Impact of Skin Damage on Horizontal Well Flow Distribution

2000· article· en· W4244219928 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
John L. McMullan, Todd Larson

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueOil and Gas Production Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCitationDownloadComputer scienceLibrary scienceOperations researchEngineeringWorld Wide Web

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Impact of Skin Damage on Horizontal Well Flow Distribution John H. McMullan; John H. McMullan Louisiana State University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Todd A. Larson Todd A. Larson Marathon Oil Company Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/CIM International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, November 2000. Paper Number: SPE-65507-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/65507-MS Published: November 06 2000 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation McMullan, John H., and Todd A. Larson. "Impact of Skin Damage on Horizontal Well Flow Distribution." Paper presented at the SPE/CIM International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, November 2000. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/65507-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/CIM International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology Search Advanced Search AbstractOne of the common applications of horizontal wells is the development of thin oil columns underlain by bottom water and/or overlain by a gas cap. Vertical wells are not suited in this situation due to the rapid coning of water or gas at reasonable production rates. Horizontal wells correctly positioned in the oil column, however, can produce at high flow rates with very little drawdown. The small drawdown significantly delays the breakthrough of water or gas at flow rates much higher than the flow rates possible from a vertical well.The flow distribution in a horizontal well designed to develop a thin oil column can be significantly impacted by friction losses in the wellbore. The impact of friction results in a higher drawdown at the heel as compared to the toe of the horizontal well. While this impact is insignificant in lower permeability systems, it can lead to premature water or gas breakthrough at the heel of the well in high permeability systems produced with low reservoir drawdown.Skin damage is normally undesirable due to its detrimental impact on well productivity. In high permeability systems developed with horizontal wells, however, well productivity is normally not a problem. Skin damage actually diminishes the detrimental impact of friction in horizontal wells by improving the flow distribution. This study investigates the intentional inclusion of mechanical skin damage in a high permeability, North Sea horizontal development. Reservoir simulation was used to justify and design a limited entry completion that was shown to improve flow distribution and oil recovery, at a significantly lower completion cost. The desired uniform flow rate distribution was confirmed by a PLT run in the first well, and through reservoir simulation and history matching.IntroductionHorizontal wells have been successfully applied in numerous North Sea fields. Horizontal wells have been utilized for improving well productivity, such as in the high oil viscosity Captain Field1. Another common application has been the development of thin oil columns that are overlain by a gas cap and/or underlain by an active aquifer. In this situation, horizontal wells are selected to minimize drawdown while producing at high rates to delay and minimize coning of either gas or water. This horizontal well application has been successfully applied at Alba2, Gryphon3, Harding, and Troll Fields4, to name a few. Jayasekera5 presented a recent review of the challenges of these types of developments in the U.K. sector of the North Sea.The West Brae Field was discovered in 1975 with the drilling of the second well in the Brae Field complex. While the discovery well and a successful delineation well tested at rates in excess of 4,000 BOPD from a 92 feet thick oil column, reservoir analysis indicated that a vertical well development could be expected to rapidly cone water. The possibility of a communicating gas cap was also suggested, further complicating potential coning problems. It was not until the late 1990's with the advancement of horizontal well and subsea technology that development of the West Brae Field was considered economically viable.Development plans for the West Brae Field included the drilling of several horizontal wells from a subsea template with production delivered to the existing Brae A Platform for processing and transport. Provision for incorporating the adjacent Sedgwick Field into the development was included in the planning and design. Based upon the successful development of several analogous fields, completion of the horizontal wells with screens in an open hole was chosen as the completion technique. While this technique typically employed pre-packed screens, failures were reported to be fairly common. Because of the expense and difficulty of intervention in a subsea well in the event of a failure, the decision was made to use a premium, all metal screen. Keywords: recovery, directional drilling, friction, modeling & simulation, fluid dynamics, spe petroleum society, completion efficiency, reservoir simulation, upstream oil & gas, pressure drop Subjects: Drilling Operations, Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, Reservoir Simulation, Directional drilling, Flow in porous media This content is only available via PDF. 2000. SPE/PS-CIM International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,909
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetOil and Gas Production TechniquesTravaux en français237 207