MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4244439644 · doi:10.1097/01.wco.0000436101.90266.c8

Editorial introductions

2013· article· en· W4244439644 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueCurrent Opinion in Neurology · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNeurorehabilitationMedicineMilestoneEditorial boardLibrary scienceMedical educationPsychologyNeuroscienceHistoryRehabilitationComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Current Opinion in Neurology was launched in 1988. It is one of a successful series of review journals whose unique format is designed to provide a systematic and critical assessment of the literature as presented in the many primary journals. The field of neurology is divided into 14 sections that are reviewed once a year. Each section is assigned a Section Editor, a leading authority in the area, who identifies the most important topics at that time. Here we are pleased to introduce the Journal's Section Editors for this issue. SECTION EDITORS S. Thomas CarmichaelS. Thomas CarmichaelS. Thomas Carmichael is a Neurologist and Neuroscientist in the Department of Neurology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, USA. Dr Carmichael is Professor and Vice Chair in the Department, with active laboratory and clinical interests in stroke and neurorehabilitation and how the brain repairs from injury. He received his M.D. and Ph.D. degrees from Washington University School of Medicine, USA, in 1993 and 1994, and completed a neurology residency at Washington University School of Medicine, serving as Chief Resident. Dr Carmichael was a Howard Hughes Medical Institute postdoctoral fellow at UCLA from 1998 to 2001. He has been on the UCLA faculty since 2001. Dr Carmichael's laboratory studies the molecular and cellular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke and other forms of brain injury. This research focuses on the processes of axonal sprouting and neural stem cell and progenitor responses after stroke, and on neural stem cell transplantation. Dr Carmichael is an attending physician on the Neurorehabilitation and Stroke clinical services at UCLA. Dr Carmichael has published important papers on stroke recovery that have defined mechanisms of plasticity and repair. These include the fact that the stroke produces stunned circuits that limit recovery, but can be restored to normal functioning with newly applied experimental drugs. His work has identified a novel brain “growth program” that is activated by stroke and leads to the formation of new connections. These studies have also identified how this growth program changes with age, and how specific molecules in the aged brain block the formation of new connections and of recovery. This and other work has led to new directions in stroke therapeutics, including therapies with stem cell and tissue engineering applications. Dr Carmichael is in the midst of stroke stem cell development applications with the FDA and with biotechnology companies. Jean-François DémonetJean-François DémonetJean-François Démonet was trained as an MD and neurologist at Toulouse University, France. He complemented his training in neuropsychology at Montreal University, Canada. As an INSERM research fellow, he performed studies of language imaging using PET in London, UK, in the group of Prof. R. Frackowiak and obtained his PhD. Dr Démonet has co-founded a task force, the GRECO, that succeeded in the adaptation and standardization in French of a number of tests used in clinical neuropsychology. Dr Démonet has headed a master program in neuropsychology throughout France. Aside from classical neuropsychological studies, Dr Demonet's research work involves various brain mapping methods (PET, fMRI, ERPs, MEG, intracranial EEG recording, direct electrical cortical mapping) to explore how the brain correlates language and memory functions; these studies are conducted either in normal subjects or in patients suffering from diverse brain disorders, such as aphasia, agnosia, dyslexia, epilepsy and neurodegenerative disorders. Some of these works took place in recent Europe-wide collaborative networks such as the FP6 ‘Neurodys’ and the ‘Pharmacog’ IMI project. Studies were focused mainly on the sublexical and lexical processes especially in speech comprehension and written language production, showing the segregation of phonology-related versus semantics-related neural systems, in respectively dorsal and ventral neocortical pathways. More recent works highlighted the crucial role of the superior premotor cortex in handwriting as well as the importance of neural oscillations in conscious perception of script. From 1995 to 2011, Dr Démonet has been Directeur de Recherche in a French INSERM laboratory (Inserm UMR 825, Toulouse). He then joined again Prof. R. Frackowiak and his team of the Department of Clinical Neurosciences in Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland, as Professor of Neurology, a position supported by the Leenaards Foundation. He is the head of the Leenaards Memory Centre, an unprecedented multi-disciplinary centre putting together clinical care and translational research approaches to ageing-brain cognitive diseases. Monika E. HegiMonika E. HegiMonika Hegi is Associate Professor for Experimental and Translational Neuro-Oncology at the University of Lausanne, Switzerland. She has earned her doctoral degree in natural sciences at the Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETHZ, 1989), Switzerland, and pursued post-doctoral training in molecular toxicology and molecular carcinogenesis at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, from 1989 to 1993. Since 1998 she directs the laboratory of Brain Tumor Biology and Genetics of the Service of Neurosurgery in the Department of Clinical Neurosciences at the University Hospital Lausanne. The research focus is to bridge basic and translational cancer research, aiming at identifying new targets and predictive factors for response to therapy and outcome. These efforts are in close collaboration with international cooperative clinical trials groups, in particular the Brain Tumor Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), where she is coordinator for translational research. Analyzing molecular profiles established from tumors of patient enrolled in clinical trials has identified several molecular factors for treatment resistance, among them a stem cell related gene expression signature. Clinically most relevant, however, was the demonstration of a predictive value of epigenetic silencing of the repair gene MGMT, by promoter methylation, for benefit from the alkylating agent temozolomide in phase II and III trials for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. This has led to a paradigm change in the field, and the MGMT methylation status is now used as biomarker for stratification or patient selection in most clinical trials for glioma and for treatment decisions in particular for elderly glioblastoma patients.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,059
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,195
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,654

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,059
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,003
Bibliométrie0,0060,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0080,005
Science ouverte0,0030,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1950,124

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,055
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCurrent Opinion in NeurologyMême sujetNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsTravaux en français237 207