Establishing Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR) for Gas Condensate Wells
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Establishing Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR) for Gas Condensate Wells Sarfraz A. Jokhio; Sarfraz A. Jokhio University of Oklahoma Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Djebbar Tiab Djebbar Tiab University of Oklahoma Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, April 2002. Paper Number: SPE-75503-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/75503-MS Published: April 30 2002 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Jokhio, Sarfraz A., and Djebbar Tiab. "Establishing Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR) for Gas Condensate Wells." Paper presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, April 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/75503-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Unconventional Resources Conference / Gas Technology Symposium Search Advanced Search AbstractA new simple method of establishing Inflow Performance Relationship for gas condensate wells is proposed. The proposed method uses transient pressure test data to estimate effective permeability as function of pressure and then uses it to convert production BHFP data into pseudopressure to establish well performance. Requirement of relative permeability as function of saturation thus has been completely eliminated. Effective permeability of either phase can be used to predict the production of second phase. A scheme has also been devised to estimate the effective permeability using well testing mathematical models available in literature.Also mathematical models of well deliverability loss due to condensate deposition when dew point pressure is reached, and deliverability gain due to condensate mobility when P* is reached have been developed. Pseudopressure curves for both oil and gas phase have been developed for quick conversion of pressure data into pseudopressure. Relative permeability curves if available can also be used, however, the knowledge of saturation has to be known at all the stages of the depletion to be able to use them.Gas condensate reservoirs are primarily gas reservoirs. As the pressure declines with depletion, reservoir conditions of pressure may go below dew point and liquid begins to buildup. Such reservoirs may go under liquid buildup without showing any trace of liquid production. Sudden well deliverability loss and very high skin factor estimates from pressure tests are strong indicators of liquid buildup. PVT characteristics like phase diagram help identify the problem too. As the critical conditions are reached such reservoirs become two phase in nature.Finally, a field example is analyzed to show the use of new method developed and a step-by-step procedure is used to establish the well performance. Small operators, Independents, will benefit from this method at the most, since data acquisition like relative permeability curves require the laboratory experiments on cores, an expensive procedure.IntroductionRetrograde Gas-condensate systems have not been treated so intensively as solution gas reservoirs have been. Main reason is the phase behavior of light (C1-C10) hydrocarbons in the reservoirs. Retrograde gas-condensate reservoirs are primarily gas reservoirs. A zone of liquid begins to form as the dew point pressure is reached. The liquid keeps accumulating and does not flow until the critical liquid saturation is reached. Pressure at this point in the reservoir is termed P*. Interestingly, this liquid may re-vaporize as the pressure further crosses the lower line on two-phase envelope of phase diagram. This behavior of re-vaporization of the oil phase is called the "Retrograde behavior." Fig.2 through Fig.4 show the schematics of such phenomenon in vertical and horizontal well. Deliverability loss in such conditions is mainly due to two reasons:Gas undergoing liquid phase andpermeability impairment by the liquid. Thus both have to be handled mathematically to predict the well performance with reasonable accuracy. Keywords: flow rate, reservoir, gas phase pseudopressure, tiab spe 75503, derivative, drillstem testing, drillstem/well testing, effective permeability, oil phase, upstream oil & gas Subjects: Fluid Characterization, Formation Evaluation & Management, Phase behavior and PVT measurements, Drillstem/well testing This content is only available via PDF. 2002. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».