MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4244792619 · doi:10.2523/81730-ms

New Life for Old Wells - A Case Study of the Effects of Re-Stimulating Gas Wells Using Fracturing Through Coiled Tubing and Snubbing Techniques

2003· article· en· W4244792619 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Chad Gutor, Ali Al-Saleem, Bruce Rieger, Stephen Lemp

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Établissements canadiensSchlumberger (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExhibitionCitationLibrary scienceHistoryArt historyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

New Life for Old Wells - A Case Study of the Effects of Re-Stimulating Gas Wells Using Fracturing Through Coiled Tubing and Snubbing Techniques Chad Gutor; Chad Gutor Enerplus Resources Fund Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Ali Al-Saleem; Ali Al-Saleem Schlumberger Canada Ltd. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Bruce Rieger; Bruce Rieger Schlumberger Canada Ltd. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Stephen Lemp Stephen Lemp Schlumberger Canada Ltd. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, April 2003. Paper Number: SPE-81730-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/81730-MS Published: April 08 2003 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Gutor, Chad, Al-Saleem, Ali, Rieger, Bruce, and Stephen Lemp. "New Life for Old Wells - A Case Study of the Effects of Re-Stimulating Gas Wells Using Fracturing Through Coiled Tubing and Snubbing Techniques." Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, April 2003. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/81730-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractThe use of a coiled tubing conduit for the hydraulic fracturing of shallow gas wells in southern Alberta, Canada has increased each year since its beginnings in 1997. The coiled tubing fracturing (CTF) technique has been utilized for both new and old wells as a means of fracture-stimulating multiple reservoir intervals.This paper will detail a re-stimulation project completed during the summer and fall of 2002, in which the CTF and snubbing-conveyed fracturing (SF) processes were utilized to re-fracture a group of shallow gas wells that were originally completed in the 1970s. The objective is to examine the possible ways of enhancing production of older shallow gas wells by fracture stimulation utilizing tubing-conveyed processes.Specifically, the paper will outline ways to consider and select wells that are candidates for re-entries, in addition to the essential work and evaluation that has to be done both prior to and following the re-entry, re-perforation, and stimulation techniques. This study will also provide a relative comparison between conventional fracturing techniques used previously and the CTF and SF processes used most recently. Also included are pre- and post-stimulation production data that give a clear indication of how effective the fracturing through tubing process is when used to re-stimulate these older wells.IntroductionThe wells of interest conducted in this study are located in southeastern Alberta, Canada. They are vertical, shallow, gas wells that are 300 to 500 meters (984 to 1641 ft) in depth. The producing formations of interest are the Medicine Hat and the Milk River, layered shaly sandstone formations that fracture easily.These wells have been operational since the 1970's and were initially stimulated through casing using single-stage fracturing treatments, with ball sealers being used in an attempt to divert the treatment to multiple perforation sets. This paper examines the re-entry stimulation work done on a total of 15 wells. Ten were stimulated through CTF, and five were stimulated through Snubbing Conveyed Fracturing (SF). There were several reasons for using tubing-conveyed stimulation for this set of re-entry wells:Weak casing integrity of the wells, hence precluding stage or segregated zonal stimulation (stage fracturing) as a stimulation procedure.Minimization of production downtime for recompletion operationsEconomical stimulation of bypassed payThe economical and practical application of tubing-conveyed stimulation in the shallow gas areas of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin has been well documented.1,2,3 This paper will focus on the methods adopted to choose wells that were candidates for stimulation, well preparation work, and some of the obstacles encountered in carrying out the re-entry stimulation. Keywords: stimulation, completion installation and operations, well intervention, re-stimulating gas well, production data, upstream oil & gas, stimulation effectiveness, coiled tubing operations, shallow gas well, initial tmapr Subjects: Hydraulic Fracturing, Perforating, Completion Installation and Operations, Well Intervention, Coiled tubing operations, Re-stimulation (excluding re-fraccing), Completion Operations This content is only available via PDF. 2003. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,047
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2003
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and ExhibitionMême sujetHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisTravaux en français237 207