MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4244867768 · doi:10.2523/iptc-17625-ms

Advanced Rock Characterization by Dual Energy CT Imaging: A Novel Method in Complex Reservoir Evaluation

2014· article· en· W4244867768 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Établissements canadiensHaliburton Forest & Wild Life Reserve
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPetrophysicsGeologyLithologyCore (optical fiber)Reservoir modelingCore sampleCharacterization (materials science)Consistency (knowledge bases)Well loggingMineralogyPorosityPetrologyGeophysicsComputer sciencePetroleum engineeringMaterials scienceGeometryMathematicsGeotechnical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract A quantitative model of the spatial distribution of reservoir properties is key to understanding reservoir heterogeneity. Special Core Analysis (SCAL) data is essential input for static and dynamic modeling of heterogenous reservoirs. To provide high-quality reliable data, the SCAL program should use the right samples from the core. Conventionally, integrated geological and petrophysical approaches are applied to select samples but they generally lack consistency and seldom incorporate upscaling options. This paper presents a novel methodology for core characterization and SCAL sample selection. SCAL data is used as input for spatial distribution of reservoir properties in a static reservoir model. The analysis is performed in siliciclastics and carbonate reservoirs from wells in the Bahrah Oil Field. An integrated X-ray, CT scanning, geological, and conventional core analysis approach is applied for understanding the reservoirs. We demonstrate the efficiency of dual-energy CT imaging in producing continuous whole core scans at 0.5 mm (500 micron) spacing and in deriving bulk density (BD) and effective atomic number (Zeff) logs along the core intervals. The high resolution 3D CT images improved the sedimentological descriptions of the core and the X-ray CT-derived numerical data (BD and Zeff) are used to derive porosity and mineralogy along the whole core sections. This information is then converted into lithology logs which predicted the cross-well correlation and enhanced the previously established correlation from conventional core descriptions. BD and Zeff cross plots suggested four lithotypes in the core intervals and the corresponding lithology log helped in deriving the percentage of each type: 1. Low BD (high pososity) carbonate formed around 20% of the whole cores. 2. High BD (low porosity) carbonate formed around 36% of the whole cores. 3. Low BD (high porosity) sandstone formed around 28% of the whole cores. 4. High BD (low porosity) sandstone formed around 16% of the whole cores. The data provided a unique capability for ensuring that the plugs adequately and correctly represented the lithotype variations along the core. The overall procedure helped minimize uncertainties in defining the rock types and effectively assign those rock types to the selected samples and core intervals. Introduction Accurate knowledge of petrophysical properties is required for efficient development, management, and prediction of future performance of oil and gas fields. This knowledge necessitates the understanding of the physical properties of the reservoir rocks, the interactions of various fluids with interstitial surfaces, and the distribution of pores and minerals within the porous medium. Reservoir characterization is often acquired at wide scales ranging from seismic data to core plug data (Ringrose et al. 2008). This is a complicated reservoir modeling process that involves upscaling and averaging of measurements at various scales. Core laboratory data has a major impact on this process and can help establish a sound basis for reservoir modeling and developing effective strategies for reservoir exploitation (secondary and EOR) schemes (Masalmeh and Jing 2008). However, the full characterization of cored intervals is often overlooked and random sampling is usually acquired for special core analysis (SCAL) measurements. This can lead to unrepresentative selection of the core samples and raises questions about the effectiveness of the core data in the reservoir model and its calibration. This is particularly of great importance in highly heterogeneous reservoirs such as carbonates, which are commonly characterized by multiple-porosity systems that impart petrophysical heterogeneity to the gross of the reservoir interval. This heterogeneity complicates the task of reservoir characterization and thus necessitates an accurate and detailed understanding of the geological heterogeneities and their impact on petrophysics and reservoir engineering.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,859
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,892

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,274
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle