Canadian Indian Cowboys in Australia: Representation, Rodeo, and the RCMP at the Royal Easter Show, 1939 (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Canadian Indian Cowboys in Australia: Representation, Rodeo, and the RCMP at the Royal Easter Show, 1939 Michael Dawson Lynda Mannik . Canadian Indian Cowboys in Australia: Representation, Rodeo, and the RCMP at the Royal Easter Show, 1939. University of Calgary Press. xi, 196. $24.95 On the eve of the Second World War, eight Aboriginal rodeo riders from Alberta journeyed to Sydney, Australia, to compete at the Royal Easter Show, an annual celebration sponsored by the Royal Agricultural Society of New South Wales. They were accompanied, monitored, disciplined, and at times even had their cause championed, by an RCMP officer who served as the contingent's chaperone. Lynda Mannik's intriguing study of their reception and experiences is a welcome addition to the field of Canadian cultural history. It will prove valuable to historians of public exhibitions, European–Aboriginal relations, and, in particular, to those historians interested in the growing body of transnational studies examining citizenship and colonialism. Mannik uses her introduction to document efficiently the parameters of the tour and then employs the five chapters that follow to highlight the competing aims and motivations of the host Royal Agricultural Society, the Canadian government, the Aboriginal rodeo riders, their RCMP chaperone, and the Australian media and crowds that attended the event. The result is a wonderfully nuanced exploration, not only of the extent to which those involved were able to dictate the outcome of the tour, but also of the manner in which some of them were forced to rethink a number of traditional assumptions about cultural difference, colonialism, citizenship, and national identity. Whereas the Royal Agricultural Society had originally envisioned the tour as an opportunity to 'reproduce well-known colonial frameworks of knowledge by enhancing notions of progress and modernity through the use of primitive imagery,' the result was something quite different. The 'intended meanings' of the tour were transgressed and, to a certain extent, altered as the white Australian audience came to identify with the Aboriginal riders on a level that those involved could hardly have anticipated. This was not a tension-free process; conflict and racism directly affected the athletes' experience throughout the tour. But the story told here is a complex one in which human agency occasionally broke through cultural barriers to create new opportunities for cross-cultural understanding. Effectively organized and filled with revealing anecdotes about the men's experience at the competition and 'off duty,' this book is well suited for use in senior undergraduate or graduate courses. [End Page 357] As in any study, there are themes that remain underdeveloped. The growing literature on sport and masculinity could have been harnessed to explore the extent to which gender ideals affected the actors' perceptions of one another. And from my own perspective as a historian, I am left wondering about the overall lasting impact of this experience on the participants. The book adroitly highlights the men's agency and consistently emphasizes that the show, and the tour more generally, provided the possibility for cross-cultural exchange and a questioning of hegemonic beliefs among the Australian audience and, at times, even within the mind of Constable Leach, the men's chaperone. But a sustained discussion of the long-term impact of this episode on those involved would have helped to highlight the extent to which these opportunities were taken up and expanded upon or remained fleeting moments in which dominant notions of civilization and racial superiority were only temporarily destabilized. Finally, one ought to note that the book began life as the author's MA thesis, and while an ever-increasing number of MA programs move toward eliminating the thesis option in favour of a much shorter cognate essay, I would encourage graduate faculty to reflect upon what we are giving up in the name of efficiency: the possibility of more innovative books by early-career scholars with fresh ideas and a desire to present their arguments in a thoughtful but engaging manner. Michael Dawson Department of History, St Thomas University Copyright © 2008 University of Toronto Press Incorporated
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,016 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».