Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Re: DK Katzman; Canadian Paediatric Society, Adolescent Health Committee. Sexting: Keeping teens safe and responsible in a technologically savvy world. Paediatr Child Health 2010;15(1)41–5. To the Editor: We were very interested in Dr Katzman's article on ‘sexting’ in your January 2010 issue because it regards the topic of ‘new’ methods of communication among teens. We would like to report two cases of sexual assault in which perpetrators contacted vulnerable adolescent targets online. After having procured their intended victims’ confidence through Facebook interaction, a rendezvous was arranged. The meetings took place at midday, during the week: one on the school ground and the other near home. In both cases, the teens were invited into the perpetrator's vehicle. Once in the cars, they were driven to a nearby location and assaulted. The youth reported that the meeting and assault lasted less than 30 min. In each case, the perpetrator was more than 10 years older than the victim. Although the risks of online relationships or personal connections have been reported (1,2), we want to draw attention to the seriousness of potential consequences of establishing Facebook friendships and similar online connections through social networking sites. Research has generated a profile of youth most susceptible to aggressive online solicitation and also describes salient features of these online interactions (3). In our cases, the youth were engaged with online emotional seduction that concluded in a sexual assault. Our victims conformed to the literature's depiction of the most at-risk teens (2). The youth were between 14 and 17 years of age, had experienced previous psychological trauma and were from a single-parent family with estranged fathers. Finally, each victim was facing issues of gender identity and family loss. The impact of the post-sexual assault on the younger victim was substantially more severe and resulted in a suicide attempt. This finding among early teens is parallel to the psychological experience of younger youth, ie, ‘friends are everything’. The literature reports that younger youth are at higher risk for post-trauma consequences (4). Facebook and similar social networking sites can establish ‘friendships’ at the touch of a button, and our experience suggests that the betrayal of trust by these ‘friends’ can be devastating. With the pending expansion of Facebook, extra precautions need to be taken to safeguard youth. In addition to protecting those already engaged in virtual ‘friendships’, how are we to protect the tweens who are new to social networking? The rapidly changing and exploding popularity of sites such as MSN, Twitter and MySpace make creating a timely and effective intervention strategy more difficult. However, up-to-date information can be acquired from the teens themselves and case studies. Our fear is that if this exploding virtual world of e-victimization is not addressed, we will see an increase in Facebook-facilitated sexual assault.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,027 | 0,018 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».