MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4245644879 · doi:10.1097/01.mog.0000284386.52922.09

Editorial introductions

2007· article· en· W4245644879 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueCurrent Opinion in Gastroenterology · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Current Opinion in Gastroenterology was launched in 1985. It is one of a successful series of review journals whose unique format is designed to provide a systematic and critical assessment of the literature as presented in the many primary journals. The field of gastroenterology is divided into 12 sections that are reviewed once a year. Each section is assigned a Section Editor, a leading authority in the area, who identifies the most important topics at that time. Here we are pleased to introduce the Section Editors for this issue. Section Editors Chung OwyangFigure 1Professor Owyang is currently Professor of Internal Medicine and Chief of the Division of Gastroenterology at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan. He also holds the H. Marvin Pollard Chair in Gastroenterology. He received his MD degree from McGill University and completed his post graduate training at the Mayo Clinic, USA. In 1979 he joined the medical faculty at the University of Michigan where currently he holds numerous committee and administrative appointments. He serves as Director of the Marvin Pollard Institute for Medical Research, Director of the Gastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory and is a member of numerous prestigious national and international organizations. He was a member of the National Institute of Health Study Section, the Federal Drug Advisory Board (FDA) and the American Board of Internal Medicine. He has also served on the Council of the American Gastroenterological Association and chaired the International Committee. He served as the President of the American Motility Society in 2000–2004. Professor Owyang's work has focused on the molecular mechanisms of information processing in the enteric nervous system. His research has provided important insights into the pathophysiology and treatment of human disease states which has had important physiological and clinical implications, particularly in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis and irritable bowel syndrome. His most recent studies include the purification and characterization of the role of CCK-releasing peptide in health and in chronic pancreatitis. In addition, his laboratory is also doing studies to investigate the circuitry of the enteric nervous system in different regions of the GI tract and determine the mechanism of information processing. In recognition of his outstanding achievements in clinical research Professor Owyang received the prestigious Joseph B. Kirsner Award in Gastroenterology and was inducted as a honorary member of the Royal College of Physicians, Thailand. Professor Owyang takes pride in the over 25 fellows he has trained, many of whom are now important contributors in the field of gastroenterology. Professor Owyang authored more than 250 publications and co-authored with Professor Tadataka Yamada the new Textbook of Gastroenterology which is considered by many to be the best in its field. William R. BruggeFigure 2In this issue we have introduced a new frontier for endoscopy, transgastric endoscopy. This is an area of active investigation in many endoscopic research laboratories, but few human studies have been performed. The animal studies have suggested that these new techniques could have widespread applications in the performance of procedures in the peritoneal cavity. There are two potential advantages for NOTES (natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery) endoscopy and surgery. Most important, this technique could substantially reduce post-operative time and pain. Secondly, NOTES may broaden the ability of laparoscopic surgery to provide resection of occult or retroperitoneal structures. Thus far a range of diagnostic procedures have been demonstrated in animal trials, including peritoneoscopy, peritoneal and serosal sampling, and solid organ biopsies. The interest in transgastric peritoneoscopy is based upon the potential for high resolution flexible endoscopic examination of the peritoneal cavity. It is not obvious what a flexible endoscopic exam could offer that could not be provided by laparoscopy. It is conceivable that enhanced imaging abilities of endoscopy might be more sensitive for the detection of occult peritoneal metastasis or an atypical mycobacterium infection in the periteoneal cavity. The NOTES procedures will require the collaboration between GI endoscopists and GI surgery. In our institution, this organization was relatively easy to achieve because the two departments freely communicate and collaborate. This team-building may be more of a challenge in other environments. In terms of building expertise in therapeutic NOTES procedures, collaboration between laparoscopic surgeons and therapeutic endoscopists is critical. Although there are several obvious procedures that could become part of the NOTES armamentarium, it is difficult to imagine how NOTES procedures will significantly improve the safety and comfort of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and tubal ligation. On the other hand, there are likely to be procedures that cannot be readily and safely performed with laparoscopy; for example, distal pancreatectomy, full thickness gastric resection, and retroperitoneal resection (e.g. adrenalectomy). NOTES may provide a lower risk procedure with fewer post-operative complications. In the coming year we will witness a surge in the number of publications focusing on NOTES procedures. It will be critical that the readers, reviewers, and editors maintain a healthy skepticism and an open eye to innovation. Stay tuned.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,572
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,303

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,074
Tête enseignante GPT0,410
Écart entre enseignants0,336 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCurrent Opinion in GastroenterologyMême sujetContemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeTravaux en français237 207