Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Welcome to the 2017 Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering!This is the 28th edition of the conference, which is a premier venue for research in rendering and related areas.This year's conference is held in Helsinki, Finland on 19-21 June 2017, and co-located with the Workshop on Material Appearance Modeling.We look forward to welcoming researchers eager to meet and discuss the various areas and applications of rendering.As in earlier years, EGSR 2017 offers two submission tracks.The traditional "CGF track", with papers that are reviewed for publication in Computer Graphics Forum, is accompanied by an "Experimental Ideas and Implementation" (EI&I) track.The latter targets submissions with fresh ideas, algorithmic details, or best-practice solutions that might still require further validation, but that would be inspiring for the community.We received a total of 74 abstract submissions (53 in the CGF track and 21 in the EI&I track).After some withdrawals in the CGF track, we had a total of 41 full CGF paper submissions for review.The IPC accepted 16 full CGF papers and 12 EI&I papers for a total of 28 papers (two more than in 2016).In addition, we offered invitations to three CGF papers to be presented in our program.Thus, we will have a total of 31 presentations in an exciting and packed 2.5-day event.In addition to the paper talks, our program includes two great keynote talks given by Prof. Ren Ng from UC Berkeley and Prof. Kun Zhou from Zhejiang University.We are very excited to hear about their latest work and thank them for accepting our invitation to present at EGSR.We would like to thank both the authors for the high quality of the submitted papers as well as the IPC members for their great effort during this very tight multi-stage review process.We have kept the review process the same as in the previous years, with three IPC reviewers per paper submission.Some of the papers rejected to CGF track were given the opportunity to present in the EI&I track.We further thank Stefanie Behnke for her tremendous help in producing the EGSR proceedings, and for very quickly addressing a variety of unexpected issues that came up at different times throughout.We are very grateful to be able to count on her during the entire process.Additionally, we would like to thank Min Chen,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,132 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle