Transplantation: A Report of Progress
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Editors of Transplantation are pleased to publish a special issue of the journal devoted to the XXIII International Congress of The Transplantation Society (TTS) held earlier this year in Vancouver. This issue includes the keynote speeches given during the Presidential Plenary Session, 2010 TTS Award Recipients and manuscripts submitted by authors of the abstracts that received the highest scores during abstract review that after peer review were accepted by the Editors for publication. Congratulations to all the TTS Award Recipients and authors whose work is published in this issue. This is an exceptional achievement. Transplantation aims to publish high-quality articles as rapidly as possible. The streamlined editorial process enables a first Editorial decision to be communicated to authors within 21 days of manuscript submission. The hard work and dedication of the Editorial Board in achieving this rapid response time for authors is highly valued by both the Editors and the publisher. To acknowledge the important contribution made by reviewers to the peer review process, the Editors of Transplantation have worked closely with TTS, a Continuing Medical Education provider, to enable Continuing Medical Education credits to be offered to each reviewer who returns a high-quality review of a manuscript submitted for consideration for publication in Transplantation. To make new findings available to the transplantation community as rapidly as possible, electronic publication ahead of print is a key feature of the new journal website http://journals.lww.com/transplantjournal. The website also provides powerpoint slide sets of the figures from each article, collections of topical articles published in Transplantation, and virtual journals for each specialist working in the field, covering kidney, pancreas/islet, liver, heart, and lung and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. To enable the publication of detailed methodology, the Editors have agreed that detailed information for Materials and Methods will be included in the published journal as supplemental digital content (SDC). Authors are therefore requested to include a brief Methods section in their manuscript and to prepare a separate file, to be submitted for peer review at the same time as the manuscript that gives the detailed information. To ensure that references continue to appear in order, ie in the published journal and SDC, the Methods section has been relocated to appear after the Discussion section. The Editors hope that this new format will facilitate the use of SDC, expanding the amount of information that can be provided for each manuscript published in Transplantation. Transplantation is the official journal of TTS and is proud to provide the transplant community worldwide with current perspectives on the science and clinical practice of transplantation internationally. The Editors would like to express their thanks to those who contributed to this special issue of Transplantation dedicated to the XXIII International Congress of TTS and to all those who have played a key role in the successful year enjoyed by Transplantation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,030 | 0,046 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,019 | 0,011 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,010 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,033 | 0,018 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».