MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4246320317 · doi:10.5325/jmorahist.20.1.0119

Ahâk! Ahâk!: Moravian Music of the Labrador Inuit

2020· article· en· W4246320317 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Moravian History · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBeholdHistoryArtLiteratureArt history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Tom Gordon's compilation of Inuktitut Moravian music of the Labrador Inuit provides a wealth of musicological and historical information. Gordon's research interests range from the eighteenth-century music of Labrador to avant-garde music of the early twentieth century, and his deep engagement with two centuries of music history shines through in the historical essay and track commentary of the booklet. The history of the Moravian mission in Labrador and its rich Inuit Moravian music tradition is presented through historical photographs, maps, sheet music, a thoroughly researched essay, a CD compilation of recordings, and detailed commentary on each track. The tracks are largely compiled from previous twentieth-century releases from the early twentieth century through 2016, with most from the 1960s. Although remastered for this 2018 release, the varied sound quality provides an authenticity and charm that speaks to the history of this music on its own.The sometimes-striking and sometimes-familiar audio tracks range from original Inuit compositions to a rendition of one of Haydn's oratorios, but the uniqueness of Labrador Moravian music is consistent throughout the CD. Appropriately, the first track, “Ahâk! Ahâk! Gûdipta iglunga” (Behold! Behold! The doors of God's house are opened), from which the compilation takes its name, was the first anthem composed by an Labrador-Moravian and is based on a text also composed in Inuktitut (49–51).The essay and commentary are presented first in Inuktitut and, in the last half of the booklet, in English. The track commentaries discuss the Moravian and Inuit origins of each piece, the instrumentation, vocal practices, and, when possible, the dates and performers for each recording. The booklet is perfectly designed for reading while listening to the CD. Musicologists will appreciate the discussion of meter, melody, harmonic emphases, instrumentation, and Inuit tonal preferences. Historians will appreciate the extent of primary source excerpts and quotations that ground the entire text. Excerpts from eighteenth-, nineteenth-, and twentieth-century Labrador mission diaries, letters, and original music manuscripts provide a backdrop illuminating the histories of Labrador mission communities and the audio recordings themselves. The essay discusses the centrality of Moravian Inuit choirs and brass bands in mission communities, such as Nain, Hopedale, Hebron, and Makkovik, from the 1770s through the revitalization of this music tradition in recent decades. The community role of choirs and brass bands among the Labrador Inuit is revealed with reverence for Inuit agency in producing a distinct, indigenous, Christian sacred music. Discussion of expanding community leadership roles of choir leaders and organists demonstrates social change over time in these communities, while the recordings demonstrate the continuity of the music tradition.The treatment of pre-mission indigenous history is brief, balanced by an equally brief discussion of Moravian history. The focus on Labrador's colonial mission history, the collaborative atmosphere of the mission communities, and Inuit agency in developing a distinct Labrador-Moravian music centers the cultural distinctions of the music itself. The images interspersed across the Inuktitut and English sections of the booklet augment written descriptions and narrative, demonstrating the good humor and somber attentiveness with which the Inuit approached music performance and worship. The reader can easily imagine many of these tunes ringing out from the brass band pictured on the roof of the church at Nain (59).If there is a shortcoming to this wonderful compilation, it is the lack of engagement between the Inuktitut and English languages. No English-language translations of the hymn lyrics are provided. This omission is perhaps forgivable because most of the songs are readily available in English. Inuktitut readers are a core constituency of the intended audience, and providing the entire text in Inuktitut first rightfully privileges indigenous readers. Still, translations of the Inuktitut lyrics into English would help demonstrate the intellectual and cultural distinctions of Inuit Moravians and provide a more valuable resource for linguistic studies. As of 2013, the Northwest Territories Official Language Act recognizes Inuktitut and is generally accepted across Canada. There are approximately 3,500 monolingual Inuktitut speakers in Canada, and upwards of 35,000 bilingual Inuktitut speakers, including the vast majority of Labrador Inuit. Labrador Inuit speak their own dialect and have a literate tradition that was adapted from Greenland Moravian missionaries after 1760. The polysynthetic constructions that were undoubtedly developed to present Moravian theology and Christian faith in Inuktitut are therefore obscured and remain invisible in this publication. Inclusion of English-language translations would illuminate this history as well, but would require an entirely different sort of work and a significantly longer text that might deemphasize the musicological focus. Altogether, Ahâk! Ahâk! is an excellent multimedia production useful for historians, musicologists, indigenous studies scholars, and curious readers and listeners.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,223
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,212
Écart entre enseignants0,181 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Moravian HistoryMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207